- Sep 6, 2000
- 10,811
- 18,399
Air Jordan XXXVII (37) first look…
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by AIR J XIII,
- Start date
- Jul 22, 2016
- 207
- 279
Ignore him. He rather be playing in designer sneakersWow. These have GOT to be doing something if you didn't immediately trash them!
- Feb 13, 2016
- 183
- 85
i may be the few here, but i like the silhouette of this shoe A LOT. I never balled in jordans before because of its price point, but the huge negative feedback on these have been a huge favor for me given i can easily pick up additional pairs for less than $100. And initial try on you get the awkward "arch poke" but after awhile you don't notice it. And comfort is not too bad.
- Feb 7, 2016
- 13,286
- 10,780
shoes that I trash deserves it, like these ones......Wow. These have GOT to be doing something if you didn't immediately trash them!
it is pretty common sense why
Attachments
- May 30, 2018
- 3,123
- 9,369
BHM Low:
- May 30, 2018
- 3,123
- 9,369
Tons of Tatum game worn pairs hit “shelves”
- Sep 6, 2000
- 10,811
- 18,399
You keep using this same example as if it proves anything definitively. Zion had a very public blowout in the PG1 and everybody loved playing in that shoe. Plenty of other shoes have had blowouts over the years too. It's not like the Jordan 37 is the only pair that's ever done that in history. "Trash" is subjective, and you've certainly made your personal feelings known...ad nauseum.
- Feb 7, 2016
- 13,286
- 10,780
before that incident happened. a few people were already suspect about the material implementation. you might call it an isolated incident, but regardless it proved the point of criticism, the material in question "RIPPED". you have to ask yourself, why the new and other iterations of the 37 especially the lows are well structured. personal feelings + fact that the material in question is poorly implemented. also, dismissed the fact that some funny characters here accuse me on hating every shoe that comes out just because they are Jordan shills and have the feeling that they have to defend a product blindly regardless of what it is.
- Sep 6, 2000
- 10,811
- 18,399
- Jan 10, 2016
- 17,924
- 21,210
“Shelves” .. you mean eBay? Or..?Tons of Tatum game worn pairs hit “shelves”
- Dec 17, 2018
- 5,328
- 9,799
I just compared a PF and a non-PF Hare and I don’t see a difference in the traction pattern or compound even though the PF has a XDR tag. It feels and looks the same. I also thought this when I bought the Dynasty XXXV, what am I missing? Also, interesting the Guos only come in PF (except Grade School).
- May 30, 2018
- 3,123
- 9,369
BHM Low:
- May 30, 2018
- 3,123
- 9,369
Team plug
- Apr 12, 2017
- 1,796
- 5,553
- May 15, 2003
- 56,739
- 65,816
How old are you?
- Sep 13, 2016
- 138
- 94
Did you noticed if the PF version felt wider?
- Dec 17, 2018
- 5,328
- 9,799
Barely, what was the first silhouette to have PF? XXXII?
- Jan 5, 2011
- 1,084
- 465
Unless there are other colorways that I have not seen releasing I am done with the 37s and okay with that! These colorways are clean and OG. Amazing that these have way more breathing room then the 36s and I have the PF versions of those! Yes, I know that is the first Superbowl jersey, however unless I missed the release, I am going to get the white jersey they are wearing this year.
- Feb 19, 2013
- 11,832
- 14,477
- Oct 8, 2013
- 2,161
- 3,044
Yeah a lot of shoes have had that problem. I own a pair but they're ugly and nothing more or less 
I still wear them though because honestly they're comfortable and I like feeling a little breeze on my toes.
I still wear them though because honestly they're comfortable and I like feeling a little breeze on my toes.
- Aug 10, 2012
- 20,424
- 36,772
- Feb 7, 2016
- 13,286
- 10,780
- Jan 10, 2016
- 17,924
- 21,210
Celtics trainer in back there with JT's custom orthotics taken out of the shoes
- Oct 3, 2019
- 1,098
- 1,698
Could those be the "Citron Pulse" pair releasing June 1st according to J23?
- May 30, 2018
- 3,123
- 9,369
Nope, its lemonade PE
