- 5,247
- 4,069
Interesting take, GG.Originally Posted by golfinguru11
Im about to get a TON of hate from the team Penny d-riders, but its ok. I'll live...
Nike is making this shoe (and the Penny shoe line) out to be something that it simply is not. Shoe heads make penny out to be some god-like dude who was on the level of MJ, when in reality if you look at his stats he is nothing that special. He averaged like 20 7 and 5 is his BEST years (of which he had like 4 of since he was injured all the time). When a dude is more known for his sneaker line than his career, that is a problem imo. So for Nike to be releasing foamposites (which WERE NOT revolutionary by any means. How many performance shoes today have foamposite in them? They are as heavy as a brick.) like they are some sort of amazing revolutionary classic shoe is Nike being Nike, manipulating the consumer into thinking these are some sort of amazing shoe. They sat on shelves back then for a reason.
Also, EVERY COLOR THEY RELEASE IS MONOTONE with black nubuck eyelets/lining. There is no paneling like on an air force or dunk, so the potential for non-OG CWs to become great is really not there. These foams that release literally take 5 minutes to come up with. I'd bet the Nike people close their eyes and randomly picks a color on the color wheel. I have no clue how they still sell out and sell for over retail @ $220!!! That foam material is actually cheaper to make than regular pleather/suede shoes. The reason they costed a lot back in 97 is because the molds were a few hundred thousand to build each, but they have the SAME mold from 97. People are dumb.
As far as whether Penny the player deserved this treatment, that's an interesting, but I'm sure wholly relevant question. I guess Penny had the potential to be a transcendent player and showed flashes of it, but in truth never really achieved anywhere near his potential, injuries playing a huge role in that. But, it's worth noting that way more players in Penny's era had sigs or pseudo sigs than today.
As far as the shoe not being revolutionary, tech-wise, it's a worthwhile perspective to consider that the material did not subsequently become a staple of Nike's stable of materials. I mean, when you think about design and tech elements that really revolutionized and then become just part and parcel of the brand you have "Air" most obviously. Max Air. Then, you have Zoom Air. The Huarache sock.Even something like Flywire has been more widely used in Nike's production already than Foam has. There's really a lot ahead of the Foam.
But, the flip side is that the shoe was truly like nothing else that had existed before it. So, while the revolution may not have established the staying power as some of Nike's best technological breakthroughs, there was true novelty and design breakthrough in this shoe.