Bred 11 Legit CHECK!

[yyyy2999]

Dude posting for cheap, saying 2012 "early release" And "may" have flaws.

 

[soiefresh]

id go with Not Legit

cover film not shiny, white mid sole not poninty enough. there's something weird about the PL on d back

 

[yyyy2999]

Thanks, but i would still like to hear more opinions so feel free to comment ppl.

 

[cream1]

I'd say they're fake, if you look at the pic of the back of the shoes, you can see the alignment of the '23' on the left shoe is off, also on the left shoe again, look at the stitched jumpman logo on the side, the logo pretty much touches the part with the '23'. Also, the tab on the tongue is off and out of position. I understand he said they're 'early' release with flaws but these just look off to me. Best to avoid.

 

[ninjahood]

unless you show pics of da carbon fiber these could either be:

perfect fakes

grey market pairs (authentic but made unauthorized)

early release (authentic but may have flaws from retail pairs)

you need more pics OP.

 

[ninjahood]

oh i see pics of da carbon fiber from da first page...

so they can either be retail pairs or grey market pairs.....more pics of da box if anything.

 

[Bert.]

hes saying they are early release? ok then thats what they are but to confirm should post a pic of the carbon fiber. its either they are actual early release or straight up fakes with the plastic carbon

 

[dread420]

The 23 on the back is pretty beat up and its not in the perfect alignment. The box is ugly, thick on its edges which is different from the legit nike shoe boxes. Fake dude

 

[achang]

Fake, the tag is almost at the 4th string and the laces look a lit skinny
 

 

[yyyy2999]

Thanks all of you for your imput!! I'll pass on these not worth the risk.

 

[crakademics]

Ya those look fishy

 

[jlibron11]

need some more up close pics cant tell