- 17,307
- 9,008
I'm feeling EXTREMELY optimistic..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
this presser should be on News 10Press conference scheduled at 2 PM today likely to hash out last night's reports.Sacramento comfortably moving quickly.
— Aaron Bruski (@aaronbruski) January 23, 2013
I hope Sac gets to keep there team here!!! But I do think its time for a new arena lol.. I would love to see Seattle get an expansion team!
— Jared Dudley (@JaredDudley619) January 23, 2013
this tweet got Darren Rovell completely roasted on twitterRemind me why we are trying to save the Kings for Sacramento again? Crowd tonight instagr.am/p/U2durnJQtR/ (via @drywit)
— darren rovell (@darrenrovell) January 24, 2013
I don't mean to **** on everyone's parade, because I admire all your optimism. I've been in your shoes before, but this is practically a done deal as I see it.
You all do know that Clay Bennet will owe the city of Seattle $30 million if there is no team by next year right?
And surprise, he's also head of the relocation committee... That fact alone should make things clear.
The deal has been signed by both parties, all thats needed is a vote from the BOG. There's no way they are going to set a precedent saying that owners can't sell to whoever they want to by voting this down. They won't want to risk the same happening to them in the future...
You guys fought hard, but money talks. :\
I don't mean to **** on everyone's parade, because I admire all your optimism. I've been in your shoes before, but this is practically a done deal as I see it.
You all do know that Clay Bennet will owe the city of Seattle $30 million if there is no team by next year right?
And surprise, he's also head of the relocation committee... That fact alone should make things clear.
The deal has been signed by both parties, all thats needed is a vote from the BOG. There's no way they are going to set a precedent saying that owners can't sell to whoever they want to by voting this down. They won't want to risk the same happening to them in the future...
You guys fought hard, but money talks. :\
You don't know anything more than any of us do, including reporters. Everything for the most part are assumptions. So it doesn't matter how much of a done deal you see this to be because at the end of the day you know about as much as my grandma does....and she's old, blind, and senile..
My buddy texted me this earlier todayyo rck thanks for these up to the minute updates. u got that info from twitter or StR?
Go **** yourselfPutting a request in to the mods to make this a Seattle thread...Sacramento is gone
1994: Timberwolves were blocked from selling and relocating to New Orleans.
I don't mean to **** on everyone's parade, because I admire all your optimism. I've been in your shoes before, but this is practically a done deal as I see it.
You all do know that Clay Bennet will owe the city of Seattle $30 million if there is no team by next year right?
And surprise, he's also head of the relocation committee... That fact alone should make things clear.
The deal has been signed by both parties, all thats needed is a vote from the BOG. There's no way they are going to set a precedent saying that owners can't sell to whoever they want to by voting this down. They won't want to risk the same happening to them in the future...
You guys fought hard, but money talks. :\
Putting a request in to the mods to make this a Seattle thread...Sacramento is gone
^you seem to be pretty well informed... But I don't understand why you Seattle folk are so convinced its a done deal, yet y'all (not you guys but local Seattle radio, media, press, twitter) want Sac to give up and just continually mock us
I don't mean to **** on everyone's parade, because I admire all your optimism. I've been in your shoes before, but this is practically a done deal as I see it.
You all do know that Clay Bennet will owe the city of Seattle $30 million if there is no team by next year right?
And surprise, he's also head of the relocation committee... That fact alone should make things clear.
The deal has been signed by both parties, all thats needed is a vote from the BOG. There's no way they are going to set a precedent saying that owners can't sell to whoever they want to by voting this down. They won't want to risk the same happening to them in the future...
You guys fought hard, but money talks. :\
I am going to point out how stupid you are (for everyone to see): That $30 million payout from Clay Bennett was contingent on funding for an arena (or just upgrades to KeyArena, even) being APPROVED by 2009 (didn't happen), and a team NOT being here within five years. Considering no such funds were approved, Bennett is off the hook for that $30 million, regardless of whether or not a team comes to Seattle this year (or ever).