kobefan88
Banned
- 173
- 10
First thing I said in the thread: After the Jordan era, Kobe is the best player not named Tim Duncan, Steve Nash, LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, Carmelo Anthony, or Kevin Garnett since MJ.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First thing I said in the thread: After the Jordan era, Kobe is the best player not named Tim Duncan, Steve Nash, LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, Carmelo Anthony, or Kevin Garnett since MJ.
Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
^ I said Timmy D the first time, then just forgot him as I continued responding.
First thing I said in the thread: After the Jordan era, Kobe is the best player not named Tim Duncan, Steve Nash, LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, Carmelo Anthony, or Kevin Garnett since MJ.
Kobe Bryant is the best player never to win any sort of MVP.
That's the highest compliment I can give him at this point.
Duncan? Nash? Dwyane? Garnett? Hell, Chauncey? MVPs. LeBron? ROTY. 'Melo? O.K., that's just a personal opinion, so I have nothing to back it up.
But Kobe? His 'ROTY + MVPs Trophies Room' is as decorated as the 'Suns Championship Trophies' room.
Try not to ditch our effort so quickly this time.
Kobe Bryant is the best player never to win any sort of MVP.
That's the highest compliment I can give him at this point.
Duncan? Nash? Dwyane? Garnett? Hell, Chauncey? MVPs. LeBron? ROTY. 'Melo? O.K., that's just a personal opinion, so I have nothing to back it up.
But Kobe? His 'ROTY + MVPs Trophies Room' is as decorated as the 'Suns Championship Trophies' room.
by your logic, Nash, Chauncey, Lebron are better than Barkley, awesome, maybe next time I wont negate your argument so quickly. This is where youcome in, quote a bunch of crap, think your right, call me wrong, then act high and mighty. Your entire argument for them being better is because they won aMVP, or in some cases ROTY or no MVPs. This is why people are laughing at you.
by your logic, Nash, Chauncey, Lebron are better than Barkley,
I don't get it Chuck won a MVP too.
Barkley won MVP in 93
lol, my bad, i was thinking he didnt win it for some reason. I was wrong
I think Pippen is the best even not to win MVP
nobody really knows how good pippen was
every year him and mike won the championship he was the second best player in the league
and he shoulda got the MVP in '94
Originally Posted by Girl thats Jules
I think Pippen is the best even not to win MVP
Kobe Bryant is the best player never to win any sort of MVP.
That's the highest compliment I can give him at this point.
Duncan? Nash? Dwyane? Garnett? Hell, Chauncey? MVPs. LeBron? ROTY. 'Melo? O.K., that's just a personal opinion, so I have nothing to back it up.
But Kobe? His 'ROTY + MVPs Trophies Room' is as decorated as the 'Suns Championship Trophies' room.kobefan88 wrote:
by your logic, Nash, Chauncey, Lebron are better than Barkley, awesome, maybe next time I wont negate your argument so quickly. This is where you come in, quote a bunch of crap, think your right, call me wrong, then act high and mighty. Your entire argument for them being better is because they won a MVP, or in some cases ROTY or no MVPs. This is why people are laughing at you.
Why the personal attacks?Don't worry about me; worryabout your argument.
But you are wrong. You're too condescending and proud to actually conceded, so I don't expect you to go down easy.
But that still doesn't change your error.
#1- You've already admitted you were wrong about Chuck not being an MVP.
#2- Nash, Chauncey, and LeBron have been better than Barkley SINCE JORDAN RETIRED.
You do read English, right?
Because you are having a real rough time arguing a very simple sentence, bro. I'm... I'm starting to feel bad for you.
Now, like 1D said, I simply stated my opinion. You've challenged (and failed) three times to refute my opinion, but that still doesn't make me right.An opinion can't be right or wrong. It's just an opinion. But I'm calling you wrong because... well, Barkley IS an MVP, so you're wrong. AndLeBron, Wade, and Chauncey HAVE played better than Barley since Jordan retired. So you're wrong there, too.
P.S. If you have a problem with my style, "Let sleeping dogs lie.""Leave well enough alone."Don't worry about me,then.Because if you're going to come at me instead of my argument,I think this place would be better off without you.
P.P.S. No, that's not a threat. Judging by your style (and pride), I would guess you would be quick to say something like, "See, look. Someone argueswith you and you threaten to ban them." Chill with that before the words come off your keyboard. I've had hundreds of arguments on here, and no onehas ever been banned for disagreeing with me. I'm just giving you an unofficial warning to chill with the problems you have with people when you'redebating something on here. Just a piece of advice. Do with it as you please.
#2- Nash, Chauncey, and LeBron have been better than Barkley SINCE JORDAN RETIRED.
You do read English, right?
Because you are having a real rough time arguing a very simple sentence, bro. I'm... I'm starting to feel bad for you.
that would be an analogy, where I say an argument, and compare it to what you are arguing. Your argument = Nash, Chauncey, and Lebron> Kobebecause they have some sort of MVP or accolade (in Lebron's case, a ROTY) so I simply used the same argument you were using, which I admit I was wrongabout, to show you your flaw. But since that didn't work, I will go a different route.
But Kobe? His 'ROTY + MVPs Trophies Room' is as decorated as the 'Suns Championship Trophies' room.
Kobe= Allstar MVP. There he has a MVP award. So since you are now wronglol im ******ed.
But i was merely challenging the fact that I think it is dumb to say that someone is a greater INDIVIDUAL player than someone else because they won a MVP awardin a voting system that votes for the best player on the best team. I will agree that some of those players are more valuable than Kobe, but better, no. Valuability =/= best player, hence me laughing. The only reason I laugh is because people are going to look back at Nash's career and automatically assumethat since he has two MVP's he was as good as Malone, Shaq, Duncan.
But Kobe? His 'ROTY + MVPs Trophies Room' is as decorated as the 'Suns Championship Trophies' room.kobefan88 wrote:
Kobe= Allstar MVP. There he has a MVP award. So since you are now wronglol im ******ed.
But i was merely challenging the fact that I think it is dumb to say that someone is a greater INDIVIDUAL player than someone else because they won a MVP award in a voting system that votes for the best player on the best team. I will agree that some of those players are more valuable than Kobe, but better, no. Valuability =/= best player, hence me laughing. The only reason I laugh is because people are going to look back at Nash's career and automatically assume that since he has two MVP's he was as good as Malone, Shaq, Duncan.
I agree with that only because I don't think Nash should be a two-time winner.
The first year he won (on 15 ppg, 11 apg, and 3 rpg) should have gone to either Kidd (14, 8, and 7), Garnett (22, 5, and 13) or Duncan (20, 2, 11). Or evenShaq, who finished 2nd in voting with 22, 2 10.