cool grey 11s LC help me out!!!!

[dvizzy]

 

[rapcoz2134]

GM?

The sweat stains on the tag are throwing me off...with that much wear to them, I'd expect the soles to be heavily dirty and yellowed.

 

[dvizzy]

thanks for the insight. any others that could confirm

 

[mou5pad]

Looks like it has been retrobrite.

 

[dvizzy]

owner said its only been used twice

 

[dvizzy]

anyone else could confirm if its a gm or real pair

 

[dvizzy]

anyone????

 

[Rambo93940]

The piping on the tongue is bad. 

No yellowing of the soles.

Look at the jumpman on the outsoles.  Do you see that the position of the ball in relevance to the larger white oval egg is different from one shoe to the other.  That's another tell tale sign.  All the authentic pairs I've seen the distance between the ball and egg is exactly the same from shoe to shoe, left to right etc.

7/9 to 8/11 production dates is quite short on a production run.

My two authentic pairs have the following dates. 7/3 to 9/3 and 7/9 to 9/9

Definitely fakes bro.  Not an authentic pair. 

 

[dvizzy]

good look fam, lol 831 you from the central coast?

 

[rapcoz2134]

good look fam, lol 831 you from the central coast?

You do know what coast means, right?

 

[Rambo93940]

 
good look fam, lol 831 you from the central coast?

Monterey representing bro. 

 

[Rambo93940]

You do know what coast means, right?

lol, Central as in centrally in California, not North nor Southern.  But yeah, the way you put it made me lol for a second. 

 

[dvizzy]

i see you bro, watsonville right here

 

[timmybrixxx]

You do know what coast means, right?

LOL

 

[23milo23]

My vote for these is.... OFFICIAL!  untill I see the toe box from the front. Jumpmans arent perfectly aligned  (Thanks JB) but the Carbon fiber is on point!

The tag although sweaty is good (Dates can differ) and the laceholders are good too, these were worn more than twice though

 they're are still some icey pairs on the bay that look like this pair