Is this a fair assesment of the DCEU?
"We haven't been a good reason to care about any of them"
And that's it in a nutshell. I also think there are other problems with the stories themselves, but this might be the main one. At the end of the day, Marvel's heroes have managed to gain large fanbases, pushing numerous characters who were never anywhere near Batman and Superman, in terms of popularity, into the spotlight. Iron Man has never been as popular as he is now and the same goes for Captain America. The DCEU's films haven't done a thing for Superman, Batman, or Harley Quinn (Who i'd say is easily one of their most popular female characters). Even as someone who doesn't think the franchise is as bad as some people make it out to be, I won't deny that it isn't just coasting by due to the large number of fans these characters already had, along with brand recognition.
He's right again when he mentions Batman's story arc in BvS. That opening scene of Bruce Wayne running through Metropolis and seeing the damage caused by Superman and Zod's fight was great, a perfect setup to some kind of conflict between Batman and Superman down the line. The rest of the film doesn't deliver. Batman jumps to wanting to kill Superman, ranting like a maniac about him being a threat, without any proper justification for such an immense hatred. And these is even taking Metropolis into account, because it's at such odds with Superman's other actions, which include being the one to stop the conflict in Metropolis. Therefore, you never once side with Batman, unless you just have a hatred for Superman. Compare it to something like Batman Hush or The Dark Knight Returns. In the former, Superman is being mind controlled by Poison Ivy and Batman comes into conflict with him because a villain with a physical god under her control is something that has to be stopped. In the latter, Superman's become a government stooge who is specifically sent to stop Batman at the order of Ronald Reagan. Simplification's, yes, but that sums up why the two heroes fight well enough. In both instances, there is a solid reasoning on the parts of both characters to fight one another. In the first, Superman fights Batman because he's being controlled, Batman fights Superman to save him from said control. In the second one, Superman is following the orders of the President, Batman is defending himself and attempting to send a message. Simplifications, again, but they work. In BvS, Superman has to fight/kill Batman to save his mom, Batman is going out of his way to attack a guy who routinely stops massive disasters and saves an untold amount of people, because this person might be a threat...The ****? And at the end of the day, that's why that whole "Martha" scene doesn't really work. It isn't deserved and doesn't make any sense in regards to what we've seen of Batman and his irrational hatred of Superman beforehand. I honestly think that the scene could work and could make sense in a different film, but Batman wasn't written properly before that for that kind of ending to fly.
And let's not even get into Jonathan Tornado Kent.
Obviously television and film are two different formats. Obviously this wasn't the version they wanted for the DCEU. But if you want a relatable Superman, with actual character arcs and growth, you watch Smallville. If you just want a genuinely likeable Superman, who still provides you with some good action and character moments, you watch Superman the Animated Series-Justice League Unlimited. And I honestly think you can find better versions of Batman all over the place, whether its in previous films, cartoons, or comics.