- Aug 2, 2008
- 37,536
- 13,036
Kobe standing O
standing O from the philly crowd?... didn't philly always love booing kobe?
I'm sure 80% were Lakers fans
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kobe standing O
standing O from the philly crowd?... didn't philly always love booing kobe?
Kobe said next year might be his last year, I hope not.
saying Kobe stunted his development..It's on espn.comWhat did Bynum say?
2 straight and Rockstar with the play by play!
Keep it up with the play by play fam!
I'm sure 80% were Lakers fans
Dude didn't you see Bynum lift up his right arm a bit and Morris fronted back QUICK!So glad that the cameraman caught that!!
People love the play by play.no offense but is it seriously necessary to post every 2 seconds about every play thats going on in the game? if we need that we can go to espn.com for the play by play or check our phones. its just annoying seeing every other post be "kobe hits a 3" or something like that.
Yeah you're welcome, I know some people can't get MOBILE UPDATES, can't get on espn.com, or even see the game, so I try to update it, thanks.I don't know why, but even while watching the game I appreciate the play by play, good job Rockstar!
No problem man.2 straight and Rockstar with the play by play!
Keep it up with the play by play fam!
saying Kobe stunted his development..It's on espn.com
Because 3-11 is good, right?
How about he scored 30 and they won because he had a good shooting game, which has been a rarity throughout his career.
How about they won because Philly was missing it's two best players?
How about they won because they played Defense? I don't care about the 3-11 with 30+ stat, anyone who DOES care is delusional. No one ever said 3-11 was good, did I say that? Sure didn't. I mentioned it, I didn't say it was good.
Because 3-11 is good, right?
How about he scored 30 and they won because he had a good shooting game, which has been a rarity throughout his career.
How about they won because Philly was missing it's two best players?
One of those starters being the guy who is terrible and who you want traded?And Lakers are without 2 of their starters...what's your point?
Go cry a river in another thread.
He's not terrible, he was an all-star, he just doesn't fit in our Offense. Let's take out the Starting and Back-up PG in every team in the league and see how they do. How's that sound? Lakers playing with a 3rd string PG and yet he's still producing.One of those starters being the guy who is terrible and who you want traded?
Because 3-11 is good, right?
How about he scored 30 and they won because he had a good shooting game, which has been a rarity throughout his career.
How about they won because Philly was missing it's two best players?