- 461
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2005
+%$# boston and +%$# doc too
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
+%$# boston and +%$# doc too
Originally Posted by chillainvillain
Originally Posted by jmause3
Originally Posted by Girl thats Jules
KG era celtics > kobe and pau era lakers
Originally Posted by chillainvillain
Originally Posted by jmause3
Originally Posted by Girl thats Jules
KG era celtics > kobe and pau era lakers
Yeahhhhh, thats not correct.Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by chillainvillain
Originally Posted by jmause3
Originally Posted by Girl thats Jules
KG era celtics > kobe and pau era lakers
Yeahhhhh, thats not correct.Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by chillainvillain
Originally Posted by jmause3
Originally Posted by Girl thats Jules
KG era celtics > kobe and pau era lakers
Dude, you can't be serious with this. You just said Bynum sucks, then said that Perkins would have made a difference in Game 7. They both do the exact same *%!%%%# thing for their teams. Bynum is a hell of a lot better at low post defense and rebounding than Pau when he was so soft back then. Not to mention Bynum was averaging like 15 and 10 before his injury in 08...but yea, he wouldn't have made a difference.Originally Posted by P MAC ONE
Originally Posted by Krazyrodzilla
Dude seriously need to let it go. He really must forgot about Bynum not playing during the 08 playoffs huh? Not to mention Ariza injury.
Bynum is garbage, don't use that argument.
But if you think Game 7 wouldn't have been different with Perkins, I don't know what to tell you.
Dude, you can't be serious with this. You just said Bynum sucks, then said that Perkins would have made a difference in Game 7. They both do the exact same *%!%%%# thing for their teams. Bynum is a hell of a lot better at low post defense and rebounding than Pau when he was so soft back then. Not to mention Bynum was averaging like 15 and 10 before his injury in 08...but yea, he wouldn't have made a difference.Originally Posted by P MAC ONE
Originally Posted by Krazyrodzilla
Dude seriously need to let it go. He really must forgot about Bynum not playing during the 08 playoffs huh? Not to mention Ariza injury.
Bynum is garbage, don't use that argument.
But if you think Game 7 wouldn't have been different with Perkins, I don't know what to tell you.
Originally Posted by Krazyrodzilla
[h1]Rivers: Starting five undefeated vs. Lakers[/h1]
08:24 AM ET 08.25 | Doc Rivers is calling for a T, as in a technicality. The Lakers are back-to-back champions simply because Boston center Kendrick Perkinstore the medial collateral and posterior cruciate ligaments in hisright knee, causing him to miss the final three quarters of Game 6 andall of Game 7. Or so Rivers would like you to think. "They still havenot beaten our starting five," Rivers recently told ESPN 980's JohnThompson, as provided by Sports Radio Interviews. "Our starting fiveagainst the Lakers starting five has a ring. Tell him [a Lakers fan] don't forget that. We will be back strong and Perk will be there next year if there's a Game 7."
Los Angeles Times
BostonThreeParty wrote:
Originally Posted by Krazyrodzilla
[h1]Rivers: Starting five undefeated vs. Lakers[/h1]
08:24 AM ET 08.25 | Doc Rivers is calling for a T, as in a technicality. The Lakers are back-to-back champions simply because Boston center Kendrick Perkinstore the medial collateral and posterior cruciate ligaments in hisright knee, causing him to miss the final three quarters of Game 6 andall of Game 7. Or so Rivers would like you to think. "They still havenot beaten our starting five," Rivers recently told ESPN 980's JohnThompson, as provided by Sports Radio Interviews. "Our starting fiveagainst the Lakers starting five has a ring. Tell him [a Lakers fan] don't forget that. We will be back strong and Perk will be there next year if there's a Game 7."
Los Angeles Times
BostonThreeParty wrote:
you think the celtics would be up 13 with the offense perkins brings?Originally Posted by 3900stabler
if anyone thinks perkins would not have made a difference in game 7 you are kidding yourselves. with that said, without perkins the c's were up 13 mid-way thru the 3rd quarter. Boston lost game 7 because they couldn't put the ball in the basket when it mattered the most. i blame paul pierce the most. he is the best offensive player on the c's and he didn't score a bucket until the 3min mark. that's why boston lost. not b/c of perkins. c'mon doc. win like a man and lose like a man.
you think the celtics would be up 13 with the offense perkins brings?Originally Posted by 3900stabler
if anyone thinks perkins would not have made a difference in game 7 you are kidding yourselves. with that said, without perkins the c's were up 13 mid-way thru the 3rd quarter. Boston lost game 7 because they couldn't put the ball in the basket when it mattered the most. i blame paul pierce the most. he is the best offensive player on the c's and he didn't score a bucket until the 3min mark. that's why boston lost. not b/c of perkins. c'mon doc. win like a man and lose like a man.
Originally Posted by Mamba MVP
DOC?
Originally Posted by Mamba MVP
DOC?
Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by chillainvillain
Originally Posted by jmause3
Originally Posted by Girl thats Jules
KG era celtics > kobe and pau era lakers
Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by chillainvillain
Originally Posted by jmause3
Originally Posted by Girl thats Jules
KG era celtics > kobe and pau era lakers