- 720
- 69
Lol ninja keeps coming in this thread only to be proven wrong. Just cause the same materials might me used doesnt make them authentic. I don't know why that's so hard to understand.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
not true.
plenty of fakes carry da "branding" of authentic counterparts, what makes da product legit is actual materials they use and where it
was made at. these grey market pairs are being made with within da same factories with da same material. da PROBLEM is they
aren't obeying da traditional distribution channels and are being funneled out da back or however its being done.
so like i said, if you have a problem with da ethical ways these are being made outside da consent of nike then thats a conversation
im more then willing to have, but if you're still thinking that because nike didn't green light "X amount" of extra jordans from factory ___
then you can call these fake at all.
if you look at what it takes to make carbon fiber parts ALONE you would know bootleggers down have that kind of sophistication, hence
why there ISNT fake foamposites OR jordans with real carbon fiber.
Some Nters seems butt hurt that icy sole concord = fake
^ Some of them even have milky tinted soles like Concords. Unbelievable that people are really dropping $300+ dollars for them
I don't know why I'm jumping into this fire, but here we go. I haven't read this thread in awhile but going through the last page or 2 I think everyone is asking the wrong questions. The question isn't "are these gray market pairs fake?" because they are. If they're not officially authorized by Nike then they're fake, done and done. The question we need to be asking is: "why do we care?" If these are literally the exact same shoe, made with the same materials, in the same place, and the only difference between them and what you get at a Niketown is that the gray market pair hasn't been given Phil Knight's blessing... why should we care? You could argue about copyright laws and moral obligations, but my guess is that most people aren't thinking about copyright law when they go to buy a pair of shoes. I think that it's much more likely that the reason more people don't/won't buy fakes is that they don't want to be called out by someone and face the social stigma that we attach to rocking fake [insert expensive product here].
And if all of this is true, then our next line of questioning has to become "is this stigma beneficial to our society as a whole, to the specific corporations whose profit margin it affects, or is it some combination of both?"
Dude here in Houston sole 4 lyfe, look him up on FB, sells XI's that are variant , people pay $350 all day long to him for concords, spacejams etc, people just don't know or care to realize they are fake
Does Footalog sell High Quality fakes? I have a feeling they sold me a fake pair of CG XI back in 2010. I was able to get a release pair from Wellgosh and the box I got from Footlog has the lighter grey box like the video above , and what really stands out to me is the non milky toes. That was my last only time dealing with early releases. Cost me $269.00.
It's hard to tell the difference these days
It really doesn't matter, bro.at da end of da day, until there is legitimate proof of whats going on
this issue will not be put to bed.
at da end of da day, until there is legitimate proof of whats going on
this issue will not be put to bed.