- 377
- 217
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2012
No it's not.Exactly my point. If stricter gun laws keep even one less shooting like this from happening, that's a success.
This line of reasoning is completely ridiculous. There's a trade off with everything.
The problem is that those advocating very strict gun control don't see the value of an armed population to begin with. Therefore, there's really no trade off with stricter gun control. Strict gun control seems very rational. On the other hand, if you see the right for individuals to own weapons as preventing the government from having a monopoly on weapons then strict gun control is has a lot of trade offs associated with it.
Last edited: