Florida begins "no refusal" DUI checkpoints; blood on demand

1,914
154
Joined
Feb 1, 2002
Tampa, Florida-- With New Year's Eve only days away, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration expects this to be one of the deadliest weeks of the year on the roads.

But now a new weapon is being used in the fight against drunk driving.

It's a change that could make you more likely to be convicted.

"I think it's a great deterrent for people," said Linda Unfried, from Mother's Against Drunk Driving in Hillsborough County.

Florida is among several states now holding what are called "no refusal" checkpoints.

It means if you refuse a breath test during a traffic stop, a judge is on site, and issues a warrant that allows police to perform a mandatory blood test.

It's already being done in several counties, and now Unfried is working to bring it to the Tampa Bay area.

"I think you'll see the difference because people will not drink and drive. I truly believe that," she said.

Not everyone is on board, though.

DUI defense attorney Kevin Hayslett sees the mandatory blood test as a violation of constitutional rights.

"It's a slippery slope and it's got to stop somewhere," Hayslett explained, "what other misdemeanor offense do we have in the United States where the government can forcefully put a needle into your arm?"

The federal government says Florida has among the highest rates of breathalyzer refusal.

"Now you've got attorneys telling their clients, don't blow, don't blow! Because we know from the results from these machines that they're not operating as the state or the government says they're supposed to operate," said Stephen Daniels, a DUI consultant and expert witness.

Supporters, though, say you could see the "no refusal" checkpoints in the Bay area by October.

"We don't want to violate people's civil rights. That's the last thing we want to do, but we're here to save lives," Unfried said.

She adds that this type of checkpoint would be heavily advertised, with the goal of deterring any drunk driving.

U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has recently said he wants to see more states hold similar programs.

Source: http://www.wtsp.com/news/...yid=165079&catid=250

mad.gif
sick.gif
tired.gif
 
Tampa, Florida-- With New Year's Eve only days away, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration expects this to be one of the deadliest weeks of the year on the roads.

But now a new weapon is being used in the fight against drunk driving.

It's a change that could make you more likely to be convicted.

"I think it's a great deterrent for people," said Linda Unfried, from Mother's Against Drunk Driving in Hillsborough County.

Florida is among several states now holding what are called "no refusal" checkpoints.

It means if you refuse a breath test during a traffic stop, a judge is on site, and issues a warrant that allows police to perform a mandatory blood test.

It's already being done in several counties, and now Unfried is working to bring it to the Tampa Bay area.

"I think you'll see the difference because people will not drink and drive. I truly believe that," she said.

Not everyone is on board, though.

DUI defense attorney Kevin Hayslett sees the mandatory blood test as a violation of constitutional rights.

"It's a slippery slope and it's got to stop somewhere," Hayslett explained, "what other misdemeanor offense do we have in the United States where the government can forcefully put a needle into your arm?"

The federal government says Florida has among the highest rates of breathalyzer refusal.

"Now you've got attorneys telling their clients, don't blow, don't blow! Because we know from the results from these machines that they're not operating as the state or the government says they're supposed to operate," said Stephen Daniels, a DUI consultant and expert witness.

Supporters, though, say you could see the "no refusal" checkpoints in the Bay area by October.

"We don't want to violate people's civil rights. That's the last thing we want to do, but we're here to save lives," Unfried said.

She adds that this type of checkpoint would be heavily advertised, with the goal of deterring any drunk driving.

U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has recently said he wants to see more states hold similar programs.

Source: http://www.wtsp.com/news/...yid=165079&catid=250

mad.gif
sick.gif
tired.gif
 
"It's a slippery slope and it's got to stop somewhere,"Hayslett explained, "what other misdemeanor offense do we have in the United States where the government can forcefully put a needle into your arm?"

The problem is it won't. This is a **+#$%% joke.

(In no way am I condoning driving while intoxicated).
 
"It's a slippery slope and it's got to stop somewhere,"Hayslett explained, "what other misdemeanor offense do we have in the United States where the government can forcefully put a needle into your arm?"

The problem is it won't. This is a **+#$%% joke.

(In no way am I condoning driving while intoxicated).
 
I think there are probably easier ways to go about it.

Blood tests with a judge on hand to write warrants is just a little much...

How about refusing equates to a $500 fine + the rest of the night in jail.


I'm also wondering if these checkpoints in that Area are every weekend, once a month, or the big week/weekends (Halloween, Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Years).
 
I think there are probably easier ways to go about it.

Blood tests with a judge on hand to write warrants is just a little much...

How about refusing equates to a $500 fine + the rest of the night in jail.


I'm also wondering if these checkpoints in that Area are every weekend, once a month, or the big week/weekends (Halloween, Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Years).
 
if this leads to mandatory drug testing for public assistance programs im for it ... they need to start sticking needles in these "poor" people's arms who cop dime bag after dime bag every day and use their little debit card for free steak and seafood dinners ...
 
if this leads to mandatory drug testing for public assistance programs im for it ... they need to start sticking needles in these "poor" people's arms who cop dime bag after dime bag every day and use their little debit card for free steak and seafood dinners ...
 
Originally Posted by moneyisthemotive

if this leads to mandatory drug testing for public assistance programs im for it ... they need to start sticking needles in these "poor" people's arms who cop dime bag after dime bag every day and use their little debit card for free steak and seafood dinners ...
Now that the most useless stereotype, and non-relative point is out of the way..
 
Originally Posted by moneyisthemotive

if this leads to mandatory drug testing for public assistance programs im for it ... they need to start sticking needles in these "poor" people's arms who cop dime bag after dime bag every day and use their little debit card for free steak and seafood dinners ...
Now that the most useless stereotype, and non-relative point is out of the way..
 
Originally Posted by moneyisthemotive

use their little debit card for free steak and seafood dinners ...

laugh.gif
 as much as i wanna be mad at them...they are giving the money to buy food...whether they use it to buy spam or steak its still within their rights to buy what they want. As a former cashier I would get heated seeing them eating soo much better than me, but soo is life.
 
Originally Posted by moneyisthemotive

use their little debit card for free steak and seafood dinners ...

laugh.gif
 as much as i wanna be mad at them...they are giving the money to buy food...whether they use it to buy spam or steak its still within their rights to buy what they want. As a former cashier I would get heated seeing them eating soo much better than me, but soo is life.
 
I've been down there on new years eve and they shut down the whole interstate for a checkpoint. They don't play. This was outside of jacksonville though.
 
I've been down there on new years eve and they shut down the whole interstate for a checkpoint. They don't play. This was outside of jacksonville though.
 
As a trypanophobic individual.. On the G I ain't going.... take me to jail then. I'll take legal action.
 
As a trypanophobic individual.. On the G I ain't going.... take me to jail then. I'll take legal action.
 
How is it right now? Say you've been drinking an driving, refuse the breathalyzer.. Do you then get arrested, processed, and then a blood test, eventually in a couple of hours? Is it called suspicion of dui? Are they just trying to speed up the process?

What sort of rights does one have if the cops have credible evidence of you being drunk while driving. You can't deny everything , right?

Im just confused how this is a bad thing, if you eventually have to get a blood test 2 hours later.
 
How is it right now? Say you've been drinking an driving, refuse the breathalyzer.. Do you then get arrested, processed, and then a blood test, eventually in a couple of hours? Is it called suspicion of dui? Are they just trying to speed up the process?

What sort of rights does one have if the cops have credible evidence of you being drunk while driving. You can't deny everything , right?

Im just confused how this is a bad thing, if you eventually have to get a blood test 2 hours later.
 
Originally Posted by WallyHopp

How is it right now? Say you've been drinking an driving, refuse the breathalyzer.. Do you then get arrested, processed, and then a blood test, eventually in a couple of hours? Is it called suspicion of dui? Are they just trying to speed up the process?

What sort of rights does one have if the cops have credible evidence of you being drunk while driving. You can't deny everything , right?

Im just confused how this is a bad thing, if you eventually have to get a blood test 2 hours later.
I CANNOT receive injections... it makes my blood pressure rise and I flip THEE !$+# out. You mean to tell me there's no other way to determine if there's alcohol in the body? I ain't going... cuff me then. I'M NOT GOING.
 
Back
Top Bottom