- Jun 15, 2013
- 26,278
- 23,262
First and foremost you cant apply the original scenario to 325 million people. We can all agree that all 325 million people would fall under I won't do nothing but call the cops (most logical thing to do), I'm going to result to violence ( a lot of you NTers), and I'm going to kill the person (although in the minority, there are still a shot load).Problem is you can't apply that logic to ALL of society based solely on a few random anecdotal incidents. There's 325 million people in the US. If you go through life with the mindset that you could die because of the infinitesimal chance the other person in your scenario is going to KILL you over inane nonsense, you're a sociopath.
The concept that if you go around putting hands on people and are not expecting death as an outcome is the dumbest ( I don't care who says otherwise ) thing anyone can do.
Companies pay top dollars for people to draft up ORMs (Operational Risk Management). You give each scenario a point value and at the end you tally the points, then you put measures in place to mitigate all the possible scenarios to reduce risk. In a physical altercation no matter how unlikely in any ORM death would be number 1.
Anyways, the argument which you fail to realize is, once again, if you put hands on someone you have to understand there will be crazy people that will try to end you. Is that better????? I truly go about life that way.
BTW, there are a bunch of successful people with Psychopath traits.