- 7,084
- 45
because nellie doesnt know jack ++!+ waht hes doing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by BangDak
because nellie doesnt know jack ++!+ waht hes doing.
Originally Posted by BangDak
first of all, i was talking about dallas.
jackson's d is overrated, and does jack up too many shots, but you're really tripping if you wouldnt do a curry+jefferies for him+AR.
AR is a perfect point foward who has so much potential, and is STILL growing. i believe hes listing at 7/7'2 right now?
AND Jackson is def. an upgrade over hughes+any other bum not named chandler/gallo.
Originally Posted by THE GR8
Thats the problem in here, its really not. People get so blinded by that one season he averaged 19 ppg, that they forget he was our entire offense. Hense why we didnt win. We didnt run plays we just dumped it intop Curry and watched. Isiah was a 1000x worse coach than a GM. He would always get over obsessed with utilizing one player whether it was Marbury than Curry and than Crawford, that we wouldnt run plays. Curry could NEVER put up even close to numbers like that on a winning team let alone a team that has an actual system.Originally Posted by Ballinsam23
stretchOriginally Posted by THE GR8
Curry doesnt beast nor will he ever. I have MAYBE seen him play a good all around game twice in his NBA career. He is garbage and we need to rid ourselves of him at all costsOriginally Posted by DubA169
listen if curry starts beasting then there will be callers. It's hard to come by a center. One of the problems is that all the contending teams have one.
But beyond that people were so blinded that season by his fluke PPG average that they would just forget how inept he was EVERYWHERE else. For a center he was just a turnover machine, whenever the double teams came he got exposed, hed either force up a terrible shot, barrel into a guy for a charge, or just turn it over. Beyond that he has never EVER played defense. Nor as he ever hustled for a boad or boxed out. So while he is putting up fluke scoring #s on one side, it does not even CLOSE to make up for his other liabilities, let alone the fact that the scoring wouldnt even be there in a real system. This is why i have said i have maybe seen him play one or 2 good all around game. The only game i can remember of recent memory was that Milwaukee game when he went off and i remembered he had a few nice defensive plays as well.
But Curry has never beasted, he put up #s in a fluke system which blindfolded people from his rediculously terrible tunover, rebound, and block numbers. So we should stop say "I hope Curry beasts like he used to" cause i said it than and ill say it again now, he wont, he cant, he never has. Is it any suprise that he has fallen off completely opnce Zeke is gone and we actually play a game in an organized system with ball movement????
I said SJax would neve come to the Knicks is because the only way that we would be able to get him is to give up expiring players.Originally Posted by BangDak
guys are quick to yell at me saying this will neve happen, blah blah blah.
no %%#$, i know that. g8 said that we'll never take on sjax, and with an offer like that, are you goign to refuse even with his 4/5 year contract? NO.
I don't think anyone is expecting him to come in and "beast" ....... just hoping he could come back and put up 12-14 pts with about 5 or 6 board or a very hopefull 8 rebounds ...... with numbers like that he becomes a good back up center or a decent starter on a playoff team .. which then makes his contract which is coming off the books next year more palatable ..... not to mention if he puts up decent numbers this season ..... then come his contract year he should improve on that and bust his but for a new contract
uh no
no one in the world would be THAT dumb.Originally Posted by BangDak
you're telling me, that you wouldnt do a trade for curry for sjax straight up?
i can care less that sjax has a longer contract. dude will contribute way more then curry, whether its jacking up shots, or his overrated d.
and yes, nellie is THAT dumb. ask any gsw fan.
why in the hell would they do that. They already have a good young center, why trade for a fat worthless one?Originally Posted by BangDak
you're telling me, that you wouldnt do a trade for curry for sjax straight up?
i can care less that sjax has a longer contract. dude will contribute way more then curry, whether its jacking up shots, or his overrated d.
and yes, nellie is THAT dumb. ask any gsw fan.
uh noOriginally Posted by THE GR8
I said SJax would neve come to the Knicks is because the only way that we would be able to get him is to give up expiring players.Originally Posted by BangDak
guys are quick to yell at me saying this will neve happen, blah blah blah.
no %%#$, i know that. g8 said that we'll never take on sjax, and with an offer like that, are you goign to refuse even with his 4/5 year contract? NO.
Clearly GS would not trade SJAx (a player whose cotract is as bad as Currys but his skillevel is 100x better) and Anthony Randolph who is a real nice up and coming player who they probably do not want to trade right now. Foir 2 buns with bad contracts?
Like i said S Jax is not coming to NY becauuse there is no way we are gonna take on another big contract especially for a guy who is not elite and is 31 yuears old and there would be no other way to get him. And Donnie is not gonna go take on more contracts just like that, nor should he.
At saying SJax and AR thats like me saying the Knicks will never get Kobe and you coming out and saying we could trade him for Curry. Say what you want about Nellie but no GM could still be in the league and be THAT dumb
EDIT:
I don't think anyone is expecting him to come in and "beast" ....... just hoping he could come back and put up 12-14 pts with about 5 or 6 board or a very hopefull 8 rebounds ...... with numbers like that he becomes a good back up center or a decent starter on a playoff team .. which then makes his contract which is coming off the books next year more palatable ..... not to mention if he puts up decent numbers this season ..... then come his contract year he should improve on that and bust his but for a new contract
and what they would think Curry is the future??Originally Posted by BangDak
^gs fans would like to say otherwise.
beans game is pretty much one dimensional, although he fits into that system well because he doesnt need the ball in his hands to succeed.
if they think beans is the future, they wouldnt be considering packing him+a bunch of others to the suns for amare at the beg. of this summer.
those two smiley faces does absolutely nothing to discredit that statement or the entire paragraph ...... if you're not going to actually reply then I don't see the point in quoting the statement
what is this your 1st post in the Knicks thrwad? I dont even want to get into the ridiculousness of calling Curry a solid starter for a winningteam. How can you win when you have his fat @%% clogging up the paint and playing NO defense whatsoever and getting out rebounded by little %+$*$+% guards?
Im just not even gonna get into how wrong that is on so many levels. How about you look at my Curry rant a few pages down or my numerous other ones. $@%$ itill save you the time, Curry is a bum, he always has been, he always will be.
what is this your 1st post in the Knicks thrwad? I dont even want to get into the ridiculousness of calling Curry a solid starter for a winning team. How can you win when you have his fat @%% clogging up the paint and playing NO defense whatsoever and getting out rebounded by little %+$*$+% guards?Originally Posted by THE GR8
and what they would think Curry is the future??Originally Posted by BangDak
^gs fans would like to say otherwise.
beans game is pretty much one dimensional, although he fits into that system well because he doesnt need the ball in his hands to succeed.
if they think beans is the future, they wouldnt be considering packing him+a bunch of others to the suns for amare at the beg. of this summer.
those two smiley faces does absolutely nothing to discredit that statement or the entire paragraph ...... if you're not going to actually reply then I don't see the point in quoting the statement
They are not that dumb. The Marco for George trade was stupid because they could've gotten A LOT more for him, but Marco was just going towaste away in Golden State.Originally Posted by BangDak
^gs fans would like to say otherwise.
beans game is pretty much one dimensional, although he fits into that system well because he doesnt need the ball in his hands to succeed.
if they think beans is the future, they wouldnt be considering packing him+a bunch of others to the suns for amare at the beg. of this summer.