- 4,701
- 22
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2007
Go with Fossil. I bought one eariler this year. Prices are right around what you want to spend. The watches dont look too bad either.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Only $450
Who would spend $450 on that monstrosity?Originally Posted by AC4Three
Only $450
Originally Posted by Big J 33
Listen to RFXOriginally Posted by RFX45
I suggest putting your budget a little higher and get a Seiko or Citizen.
This Seiko is $124 at Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Sei...tch-SGF719/dp/B00068TJ3K .
$120 for this:
http://www.amazon.com/Sei...N530W/ref=pd_sbs_watch_3 .
seiko?Originally Posted by JoseBronx
Originally Posted by Big J 33
Listen to RFXOriginally Posted by RFX45
I suggest putting your budget a little higher and get a Seiko or Citizen.
This Seiko is $124 at Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Sei...tch-SGF719/dp/B00068TJ3K .
$120 for this:
http://www.amazon.com/Sei...N530W/ref=pd_sbs_watch_3 .
OP did have a $100 budget. For $100 you can't get much and seiko isn't bad for his budget. It's much better than those kenneth colewatches.Originally Posted by Kakashi
seiko?Originally Posted by JoseBronx
Originally Posted by Big J 33
Listen to RFXOriginally Posted by RFX45
I suggest putting your budget a little higher and get a Seiko or Citizen.
This Seiko is $124 at Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Sei...tch-SGF719/dp/B00068TJ3K .
$120 for this:
http://www.amazon.com/Sei...N530W/ref=pd_sbs_watch_3 .
but fossil offers much more style than seiko no one under thirty should be caught wearing a seiko....fossilOriginally Posted by BgL2687
OP did have a $100 budget. For $100 you can't get much and seiko isn't bad for his budget. It's much better than those kenneth cole watches.Originally Posted by Kakashi
seiko?Originally Posted by JoseBronx
Originally Posted by Big J 33
Listen to RFXOriginally Posted by RFX45
I suggest putting your budget a little higher and get a Seiko or Citizen.
This Seiko is $124 at Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Sei...tch-SGF719/dp/B00068TJ3K .
$120 for this:
http://www.amazon.com/Sei...N530W/ref=pd_sbs_watch_3 .
Wow, you have no idea what you're talking about. Seiko has some nice watches.Originally Posted by Kakashi
but fossil offers much more style than seiko no one under thirty should be caught wearing a seiko....fossilOriginally Posted by BgL2687
OP did have a $100 budget. For $100 you can't get much and seiko isn't bad for his budget. It's much better than those kenneth cole watches.Originally Posted by Kakashi
seiko?Originally Posted by JoseBronx
Originally Posted by Big J 33
Listen to RFXOriginally Posted by RFX45
I suggest putting your budget a little higher and get a Seiko or Citizen.
This Seiko is $124 at Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Sei...tch-SGF719/dp/B00068TJ3K .
$120 for this:
http://www.amazon.com/Sei...N530W/ref=pd_sbs_watch_3 .
that is all.
good night.
Rolex is trash. Go with a Breitling.Originally Posted by Jalrulz
rolex.
go big or go home.
I disagree. And Fossil watches look trashy. You might as well get an Invicta...Originally Posted by PersiaFly
I agree that Seiko is a terrible watch brand at any price point. There is ALWAYS a better option than Seiko.
Originally Posted by AC4Three
I disagree. And Fossil watches look trashy. You might as well get an Invicta...Originally Posted by PersiaFly
I agree that Seiko is a terrible watch brand at any price point. There is ALWAYS a better option than Seiko.
Originally Posted by 18key
Rolex is trash. Go with a Breitling.Originally Posted by Jalrulz
rolex.
go big or go home.
Originally Posted by nicefro
any movado's around that range?
why is seiko getting %#%$$#@ on?
"Realtalk", I just might.Originally Posted by Nktran001
Who would spend $450 on that monstrosity?Originally Posted by AC4Three
Only $450
Originally Posted by torontoRaptor15
Wow, you have no idea what you're talking about. Seiko has some nice watches.Originally Posted by Kakashi
but fossil offers much more style than seiko no one under thirty should be caught wearing a seiko....fossilOriginally Posted by BgL2687
OP did have a $100 budget. For $100 you can't get much and seiko isn't bad for his budget. It's much better than those kenneth cole watches.Originally Posted by Kakashi
seiko?Originally Posted by JoseBronx
Originally Posted by Big J 33
Listen to RFXOriginally Posted by RFX45
I suggest putting your budget a little higher and get a Seiko or Citizen.
This Seiko is $124 at Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Sei...tch-SGF719/dp/B00068TJ3K .
$120 for this:
http://www.amazon.com/Sei...N530W/ref=pd_sbs_watch_3 .
that is all.
good night.
Seiko > Fossil and it's not even close. Fossil is a good starter watch but not something you would wear once you get some decent cash to spend on a nicer watch.