Grown up thread, please keep it civil. VOL. READ THE UPDATE!!

[balloonoboy]

Upon further investigation, lose is a verb and win, in this instance, is a noun.

Also, in this instance, loss is a noun.

So it would be for the loss instead of for the lose, since the article the indicates that a noun is to be used after it. Lose can never be a noun.

 

[reener]

 

[laseventrees]

Originally Posted by balloonoboy

Upon further investigation, lose is a verb and win, in this instance, is a noun.

Also, in this instance, loss is a noun.

So it would be for the loss instead of for the lose, since the article the indicates that a noun is to be used after it. Lose can never be a noun.

this.

 

[trelvis tha thrilla]

Originally Posted by SuperAntigen

"For the loose?" That doesn't even make sense...

...

 

[dead stokc]

Originally Posted by balloonoboy

Upon further investigation, lose is a verb and win, in this instance, is a noun.

Also, in this instance, loss is a noun.

So it would be for the loss instead of for the lose, since the article the indicates that a noun is to be used after it. Lose can never be a noun.

Realest @%$% u ever typed.

in this case it should be FTN as in for the noose particularly
for this dumb !+@ thread this so called "Clever" character/troll created.