I mean for real the writing for that part is worse than anything ppl could complain about that was on LOST. It's not even the type of writing where the person who knows who the killer is is gonna tell the protagonist who the killer is but beats around the bush, repeats himself, and then gets interrupted. Bad writing with no clues or even red herrings or hints of any kinds. They must think us fools if they ever use the word foreshadow. The grandfather said a whole bunch of nothing and then handed him a National Geographic mag from the 1970s like this is about to be the answer to everything. Then they got the nerve to bring it back at the end like it's some ominous sign. None of that **** makes sense
I'll warn anybody now not to read in to anything and let them try to explain this bull ****. Cuz if you get wrapped up in this garbage you will be heavily let down