- 3,184
- 10
If you think this way, then I am saying it should go BOTH ways. Women and men are sexual beings. The only reason you are witholding these views is because you want to look at women as less of sexual beings than you and see them as less equal. It is a power control role you don't want overturned. The man wants to own the woman's sexual power and make sure she lacks it. So yes, sexual prowess.Originally Posted by TruthGetsBusy
Hazeleyed Honey wrote:
TruthGetsBusy wrote:
you are clueless. If you are a woman and go get smashed whenever you choose your life will be difficult.
1. Any man that has no strings attached sex with you will lose respect for you
2. More than likely he will tell somebody. And those people will also have little respect for you
3. If you mess with dudes in the same circle, work place, or team you will not be respected
A man doesn't want a chick who is looked down upon. Woman are the choosers. A man who gets alot of woman has some kind of quality that allows him to get women. A woman is approached everyday allday so she has to be selective to who she lets in. Manwhores settle down and make the one girl feel special. Rollers have to hide their past or find a sucker to accept them. Big difference.
Its not the same and you know it. P.S.at "Sexual Prowess" . Body count has nothing to do with that. I've never been sexually intimidated by a woman
I understand having these sort of views from back in the day, but the role of men and women has changed up quite a bit. You men talking about jumpoffs yet you sure love to use them and fiend for their P for your own dog #%**-%+% behavior.
Who says it is not the same? It is what you make of it.
Funny thing is you don't even believe what you are saying. So whats you're number like Ma? You out there gettin' it in? Or you living by the outdated double standard?
you know HOW i know u corny....