- 1,045
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
they got VI's to release in black/purple in May, I'm thinking they have them confused with the black/purple XII.
Anybody know?
Anybody know?
is 23isback effin up?
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by retrowear23,
- Start date
kickinit102
Banned
- 259
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2009
Are you asking about the site or the shoes they are selling?
- 1,045
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
the site, the release date section.
baby jumpman
Staff member
- 5,377
- 495
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2006
23iswack. They never have there %##* together all they do is steal there info from here and other sites.
- 493
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2009
they are the sacramento vi's i posted pictures of that everyone said was fake!!!
- 1,045
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
mind posting them again?
- 1,279
- 14
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2005
I thought they were Lakers VI's...I guess colors are close enough to be either.
- 1,045
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
you mean on the site or the release?
- 417
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2008
Probably a GS release for the kids just like the GS release for the XII's and bro those VI's were painted stop trying to defend yourself we would knowweather or not it was legit and it wasn't homie
- 1,045
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
alright thanks dude.
- 1,881
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2008
that's what i said and i got flamed for it.... but it's kinda true
- 214
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
You stay doing your homework BabyJ.WINK.
- 926
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- 1,198
- 11
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2009
i think its the laker vi's
- 1,480
- 1,020
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2000
They are "Lakers" VI's...
Black with Yellow to Purple contrast stitching...
JM
Black with Yellow to Purple contrast stitching...
JM
- 1,584
- 339
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2008
Pics would be nice
- 581
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2009
^True.
- 377
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2009
so yea tonights threads are pretty pathetic
- 60
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2008
youre replies are always pathetic dude
youre becoming like nikeaircobraben
- 1,077
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2008
that site it is what it is
- 3,376
- 183
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2009
basically. That's the reason why I don't go on that site anymore.
- 633
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2009
Originally Posted by smidaman3991
youre replies are always pathetic dude
youre becoming like nikeaircobraben
QFT
- 9,084
- 2,298
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2008
You guys do know that KATC, Sneakerfiles all those guys get their leaks from us first right? I see it a day on here, before it shows up to those other sites. Im not trying to knock no one, but i guess it keeps everything organized when sites like that "borrow" their information from us and our members. Itjust sucks that people who do leak it dont get recognition for it.
And
at those Sacramento VIs, they were painted fam...and the only confirmed Retro VI to sport a purple colorway are the Lakers...Sacramento, in no way hasshaped Jordan and Jordan Brand, why would there be a VI to commemorate Sacramento? Besides the X's of course.
And
baby jumpman
Staff member
- 5,377
- 495
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2006
Yes I know other sites take info from here but like you said they give props to us. 23iswack steals pics then tries to cover up watermarks and whatever elsethey have to so people think it's their pics. How hard is it to say pics from: xyz. The other sites you mentioned give props and I see people start threadsfrom info they take right off these sites. It's a two way street because sometimes we get info from them, most of all we get the correct info.
- 1,478
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2008
Originally Posted by smidaman3991
youre replies are always pathetic dude
youre becoming like nikeaircobraben
