- 5,547
- 1,529
Last edited:
JORDAN 1 Black-Red -- RETAIL Vs FAKE-GM PAIRS ULTIMATE COMPARISON ON THE 1ST PAGE!!!!RECEIPTS ARE NO
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by laokratwr,
- Start date
- 101
- 12
I'm ready!
- 94,400
- 33,457
- 94,400
- 33,457
i epxect them to release next year, watch.
seems like they did it on purpose, no way they release some garbage colorways with NA but one of the original and most known CW's releases with a jumpman?
its def in the works, has to be.
airthompson
Staff member
- 13,823
- 9,623
JB better drop these in '14, or ima drive 952miles to Beaverton Oregon, hop on the elevator, go to the floor of the guy responsible for which shoes release, pour a pile of baby powder in my hand, walk into the office and
- 18,085
- 8,620
View media item 553991JB better drop these in '14, or ima drive 952miles to Beaverton Oregon, hop on the elevator, go to the floor of the guy responsible for which shoes release, pour a pile of baby powder in my hand, walk into the office and
- 4,206
- 2,409
JB better drop these in '14, or ima drive 952miles to Beaverton Oregon, hop on the elevator, go to the floor of the guy responsible for which shoes release, pour a pile of baby powder in my hand, walk into the office and
- 10,749
- 14,781
**** it. I'm just gonna un-DS my 94s. I laced them up and wore them around the house a little bit this past weekend and just decided it has to be done. They are too dope to just in the box any longer. I've been wearing my black toes a lot lately but I don't like the shape. Plus the toe box on one of my pairs is cut a little uneven. I don't think they were worth paying retail for but the OG treatment got me. Will not jump through hoops for this release but will make an effort to cop for retail just because of the OG treatment.
at myself. At least I stopped buying all the other non-OG releases. JB is terrible now.
I heard these are releasing in December now?
I heard these are releasing in December now?
- 359
- 45
**** it. I'm just gonna un-DS my 94s. I laced them up and wore them around the house a little bit this past weekend and just decided it has to be done. They are too dope to just in the box any longer. I've been wearing my black toes a lot lately but I don't like the shape. Plus the toe box on one of my pairs is cut a little uneven. I don't think they were worth paying retail for but the OG treatment got me. Will not jump through hoops for this release but will make an effort to cop for retail just because of the OG treatment.at myself. At least I stopped buying all the other non-OG releases. JB is terrible now.
I heard these are releasing in December now?
You heard right. December 28th.
- 10,749
- 14,781
Thanks for confirming. Looks like I'll be calling in some favors from my friends in upstate NY. That's how I was able to get my black toes.
- 88,746
- 47,953
the originals would be the best if you think about it... back then the company couldnt afford to skimp out
all other 1's after feel like you walking barefoot on concrete...
and the 2001 leather sucked too especially the toe box
Last edited:
- 88,746
- 47,953
- 359
- 45
I
It's like no one knows Nike owns JB. Lol.
nike charging they own selves?
It's like no one knows Nike owns JB. Lol.
- 1,480
- 186
The shadows were actually more available than the royals....you can easily cop a pair for around 200. These will be GR'd and mass produced to cut back the profits of resellers just like the fire reds dropping this Saturday. Nike is def helping the OG collectors grabbing bulls color ways
- 56,533
- 65,386
Wasn't it, it wasn't that more were made, it was that they were allocated differently. A lot of royals went overseas, but for the black toes and shadows they didn't do that.
- 48,643
- 28,906
i hear you, good decision imo (seeing as how the midsole rubber doesn't crumble on 1's - you're good to go)
95 retro shape vs 11 banned shape
View media item 554574View media item 554576
Last edited:
- 20,070
- 10,957
nike charging they own selves?
If it was true, it'd be more like Nike charging one of it's subsidiaries to use daddy's face.
I'm pretty sure that there isn't anyone on this forum doesn't know this.
Last edited:
- 10,749
- 14,781
Are these your personal pairs? I know that the 94s are wearable but I'm wondering if I should treat them in any way before wearing them since they are so old. I tried to lace through the lace hole in the nylon tongue when I laced them up and some threads started to slightly unravel and it was just not possible. I've noticed some "chalky" areas on the sole but it's very minimal. I'm hoping that no pieces of the sole chip off because they are too dry or the leather cracks because it's too dry. Any suggestions before I potentially ruin a 20 year old sneaker?
- 5,206
- 358
- 20,070
- 10,957
****
- 48,643
- 28,906
Yes those are my pics.
I've never really had problems with dried up leather on nike uppers, just issues with durabuck falling apart...
the original 1985 air jordan 1 dries up & cracks at the ankle but the 95 retro does not have that problem, so i think you should be good! & i really wouldn't worry about the midsole, the rubber is much more durable than polyurethane foam
after some trial & error i found this stuff here to treat pre-WWII baseball gloves...(after trial & error)...
View media item 554625
it has the right pH for full grain sneaker leather as well, it nourishes leathers without leaving shine-look it up if interested
like $5-$10 per bottle
...but dudes in the maintenance section could possibly help you more
good luck, but like i said - 1's are very durable "built like a tank" as some say
- 48,643
- 28,906
reener, nice!
- 10,749
- 14,781
Thanks I appreciate the veteran insight. I'll snap some pics when I get home from work to show what I'm talking about.
- 32,830
- 24,897
That '94 leather looks softer than the banned's 
- 5,206
- 358
That '94 leather looks softer than the banned's
it really is
thanks! looking to get the Chi's aswell soon.
