- May 15, 2003
- 56,736
- 65,811
so if I don't get them, this will be my complaint about why I didn't want them 
Jordan 1 High Black Toe Reimagined - February 1, 2025
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by therealest1,
- Start date
- Sep 5, 2000
- 3,690
- 7,743
First batch of pics don’t look great. I don’t care about the inscription. It’s the AIR JORDAN stamp that looks off to me. Will need to see more pics.
- Sep 22, 2014
- 13,480
- 12,002
These look absolutely hideous-do you think it’s too late for them to cancel this release?
- Sep 22, 2014
- 13,480
- 12,002
You’ll probably be able to cop at 100 bucks at this rate.. these are getting clowned all over social media.
- Dec 11, 2012
- 610
- 709
Yikes. This release turning UGLY. Fast.
Money saved for 85 Breds
Money saved for 85 Breds
- Feb 27, 2013
- 4,147
- 4,729
The Air Jordan logo on the Black Toe looks so uncentered, hopefully that's fixed.
- Aug 17, 2023
- 525
- 1,096
Imo the writing makes em even more dope....big fan of when they drop his PE ....i was hyped for the Chicago 1s with the aj2 midsole...was fcfs at the mall...flew down there on RD and they sat 2 years at jimmyjazz 
from what I can remember....let me know if I'm missing any
Chicago 1 aj2 midsole
Aj3 Washington wizards
Aj5 BM with 23 stitched
Aj10 double nickel 45
Aj11 concord lows...he wore at parade
Aj11 bred lows ...I think at a camp..even with the red insides
Aj11 space jams 2016
The upcoming sj 11 lows...pretty sure he had a pair way back
I Hate most collabs and gimmicky ones but those ^^^^ get me pumped af
This drop will be a gem
Of course the 85 cut in this color will be top shelf but still....can't hate this
from what I can remember....let me know if I'm missing any Chicago 1 aj2 midsole
Aj3 Washington wizards
Aj5 BM with 23 stitched
Aj10 double nickel 45
Aj11 concord lows...he wore at parade
Aj11 bred lows ...I think at a camp..even with the red insides
Aj11 space jams 2016
The upcoming sj 11 lows...pretty sure he had a pair way back
I Hate most collabs and gimmicky ones but those ^^^^ get me pumped af
This drop will be a gem
Of course the 85 cut in this color will be top shelf but still....can't hate this
- Oct 24, 2010
- 94,437
- 33,493
- Sep 17, 2016
- 2,787
- 4,884
on the positive side, the leather looks like it may be really nice
- Sep 22, 2014
- 13,480
- 12,002
That might the only positive thing about these monstrosities.
- Oct 24, 2010
- 94,437
- 33,493
Yet they’re gonna sell out
But L&F resale price isn’t horrible so these will prob be $300 ish depending on quantity
- Jul 31, 2012
- 362
- 1,253
If this is the official photo, L&F have better shape
- Sep 22, 2014
- 13,480
- 12,002
You really think they’re going to sellout?
Pretty much every non 85 OG AJ 1 High since Palominos has sat and gone in significant discount.
These are somehow worse than the Royals Reimagineds.
- Sep 22, 2014
- 13,480
- 12,002
Honestly maybe they are intentionally crippling this model like they did to the OG AJ 1 lows by shrinking the swoosh and giving us one less lace hole.
Wouldn’t be surprised if they want to further distinguish the AJ 1 High from the 85 Highs.
- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,319
- 70,733
Only thing worse than suede royals is patent black/reds
- Sep 17, 2016
- 2,787
- 4,884
with so much good stuff on the way, shoes gotta be perfect to go from a maybe to a go
- Oct 24, 2010
- 94,437
- 33,493
Thought these were reimagined not OG 85
and all the colorways previously of 85 sold out and sold for over retail by double atleast
These should sell out EASILY with or without the sig on the collar unless they do some weird **** to the rest is the shoe
- Sep 22, 2014
- 13,480
- 12,002
Huh? I never said they were 85s…
Why would they sellout when Royal Reimagined didn’t and were more like the actual Royal 1 highs than these are like the Black Toe 1 highs.
EDIT: Also, BTs in 2016 had less resale than Royals in 2017 did… That was a long time ago so it might not be too relevant to 2024 though.
dhtowng
Supporter
- May 22, 2010
- 9,950
- 20,899
Hold up I thought the writing was going to be on the medial/inner side of both shoes. I’m definitely out if they put that writing where the “Air Jordan” should be on either shoe. That would be dumb if they did that. Really hope this IG blog doesn’t know what they’re talking about. I suspect they don’t.
- Dec 7, 2015
- 2,204
- 7,132
At this point I'm just here for the release day shenanigans. Should have just given these the High '85 Cut with the black tongue, 'Air Jordan' stamp on the collar and no signatures. But, since we're not getting that, at least we know regular High '85 Black Toes are still on the table.
- Dec 15, 2023
- 583
- 1,691
These are prefect
2 pairs minimum
2 pairs minimum
- Jul 21, 2022
- 1,105
- 3,849
Shiiiid I’m in for 5 pairs
Keep that same damn energy later
Keep that same damn energy later
- Oct 24, 2010
- 94,437
- 33,493
The reimagined royals were also suede lol
I love royals but if they aren’t leather I ain’t copping
Not really into random materials like that which clearly others weren’t either
I’ll be shocked if these don’t sell out if it’s all original except for the signature and air Jordan on the ankle
- Sep 22, 2014
- 13,480
- 12,002
That’s a massive difference though fam.
Those shadows with all the writing bricked and IIRC those were pretty limited.
People don’t want things to stray too from the OGs, esp when Air Jordan 1 OG Highs as a model are down bad rn.
- Oct 24, 2010
- 94,437
- 33,493
What shadows?
These ain’t sitting man unless there’s something else on the shoe they aren’t showing
If the sig was black, different story. Even I wouldn’t buy them at that point
