- 720
- 195
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2014
WB pair look neater
Jordan Retro 1 High OG "Away"/"Reverse Shattered Backboard"
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by boldnewbflakes,
- Start date
- Status
- 94,325
- 33,369
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2010
The shoes don't come completely laced, but the bottom holes are factory laced.I assume you missed that the shoes aren't laced
Am I correct?
Yes but that has zero affect on the shape of the shoe. Wasn't coming at you, just a little joke
If anything I would saw the FA pair looks questionable
- 11,959
- 6,203
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2012
They look oval...
- 8,535
- 6,630
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2014
Devon.....GET THE SCALES!!!
Last edited:
- 17,129
- 8,043
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2014
Top of the tongues of the wb pair look kind of wierd ..
Can you post pics of the front and the back of the tongues?
- 6,188
- 4,273
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
Post some more detailed pics for us please
- 1,807
- 325
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2016
Well the guy who has them in front of him is saying they're identical. Just gunna have to wait to see when he answers peoples questions.
kilroythedon
Supporter
- 23,170
- 22,020
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2013
If I held both these sneakers in my hand and you told me to pick one blindly without knowing where either was from I would take the FA pair.. they look way neater and consistent with what we see in ones.. if you don't see that your blind.
- 6,188
- 4,273
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
Weren't u telling people to be patient?
well yeah? i meant be patient with receiving the shoes.. but if it's proven fakes beforehand.. i might as well just cancel cause the others will most likely be the same..Weren't u telling people to be patient?
- 6,188
- 4,273
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
U don't think your jumping to conclusions a lil quickly?
- 293
- 55
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2014
Are they suppose to look indentical? Even if both pair came from FA it would look indentical? And we all know the QC from Nike are not the best. IMO
kilroythedon
Supporter
- 23,170
- 22,020
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2013
Not about being indentical it's about finding inconsistencies in what we already have/know about Jordan 1s.
It's always hard to do this without the shoe being in your hand mainly because angles can make something look off when it isn't really off.
I'm showing you guys red lights for me, I'm not saying his shoes are fake.. I'm just saying if I owned the westbay shoe those things would be a concern for me
- 94,325
- 33,369
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2010
All theee of my banned 1 don't look identical
Just saying
Just saying
kilroythedon
Supporter
- 23,170
- 22,020
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2013
Yeah the Nike air tag does look funny
- 720
- 195
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2014
FA
WB
WB FA
WB FA
WB FA
WB
WB FA
WB FA
WB FA
- 6,188
- 4,273
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
Dude needs to post more pics
kilroythedon
Supporter
- 23,170
- 22,020
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2013
No sneaker should ever look identical to another but we're always gonna have things that throw the shoe off and we know right away somethings up
- 21,972
- 69,279
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2001
- 1,807
- 325
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2016
Wel the stitching on the tag inside the tongue is definitely different. Also the gap between the stitching on the front part of the tongue of the WB is much larger than the FA.
kilroythedon
Supporter
- 23,170
- 22,020
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2013
Your pair look like the FA pair though..
kilroythedon
Supporter
- 23,170
- 22,020
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2013
Well.. I said what I saw.
Y'all have fun with that.
Y'all have fun with that.
yall see the difference in the stitching?? FA pair has little stitches but WB has a straight line across
- Status
