- 4,318
- 10,509
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2007
Nah, the lows came in the regular jordan face box. This will also be my 1st time owning a pair of the lows.
Jordan XVII Low Lightning - May 30, 2024
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by therealest1,
- Start date
- 54,761
- 61,335
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
Always preferred the lows. I've never been a shroud guy. 16, 17, 18, 19....
AIR J XIII
Supporter
- 6,496
- 12,651
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2002
The 3 standard mids were the only ones that came with the case. The lows, crocs and mules came in the face box with bags.
- 5,020
- 7,057
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2010
Definitely still on the fence on getting the lightenings. That $300 MSRP is really making me go back and forth
- 133
- 248
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2022
are those confirmed to release as well?
- 18,012
- 8,440
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2013
Wonder how big the suitcases will be for bigger sizes. I’m running out of closet space so I don’t need JB doing too much
AIR J XIII
Supporter
- 6,496
- 12,651
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2002
The case they had in the live looked MASSIVE compared to the original ones.
- 18,012
- 8,440
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2013
Aw crap I didn’t watch the live so I didn’t catch it. Dang my size 12.5/13 gonna be enormous then lol
s dubl
Supporter
- 29,088
- 24,846
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2006
So basically only a handful of folks actually wanted these, and now they’re going to be limited/and difficult to get, so the people that actually want, won’t be able to get at the already outrageous retail.
Don’t ever change Nike/JB. Smh
Don’t ever change Nike/JB. Smh
- 28,189
- 12,536
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
I want these, but I am not going to jump through hoops to get them.
- 17,033
- 12,160
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2005
this
- 741
- 1,284
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2015
Lowkey wouldn’t mind if they dropped the mules. I refuse to put my foot in a croc
- 21,042
- 65,256
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2001
Not puttin my foot in a croc or a mule
rainking
Supporter
- 8,051
- 17,379
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2016
Not puttin my foot in 17 lows for $300.
s dubl
Supporter
- 29,088
- 24,846
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2006
The way things are looking, you’d be lucky to get em for $300. I was in at that price, but would probably off the case to lower my cost. Sounds like they’re gonna be limited, and not very easy to obtain, which is stupid.
- 595
- 585
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2013
If they were to drop a mass # of pairs at the retail price majority of them would end up @ the outlet stores.
- 18,012
- 8,440
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2013
Yeah that’s what happened last time they put out the 16-18 retros. Nike making them limited isn’t surprising but if i miss out ain’t no way im paying resell on any of these. That $300 price tag is already way too much as is
s dubl
Supporter
- 29,088
- 24,846
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2006
If they’re that worried about em ending up at outlets, why even drop em? I’d rather them not drop, than not be able to get a pair I want because they’re limited. These were pretty high on my want list, now it seems they’ll be unattainable at, or close to crazy retail.
- 18,012
- 8,440
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2013
I would say they’re less worried and more trying to drive demand by limited drops. Once people get that FOMO effect to drive up demand then Nike starts trying to milk the shoe releases
s dubl
Supporter
- 29,088
- 24,846
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2006
Hopefully it backfires, and we can all grab at retail or less.
- 1,021
- 2,969
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2023
$300 retail? In THIS economy? For 17’s, a model that is not in high demand compared to 1-14? JB is on crack.
These will sit, and will go to outlets or be had in the aftermarket for UNDER retail. Guaranteed, and you can screenshot this post.
These will sit, and will go to outlets or be had in the aftermarket for UNDER retail. Guaranteed, and you can screenshot this post.
- 21,042
- 65,256
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2001
150 the sweet spot
s dubl
Supporter
- 29,088
- 24,846
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2006
Throw limited into the mix, and young cats will be glad to pay $500 so they can flex on da gram with their suitcase, and shoes they don’t give 2 ****s about.
