- 487
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2001
Title is self-explanatory.
Jumpman Team Pro Black/Red comparison request Please
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by mikeposite,
- Start date
- 4,676
- 13
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2008
I'd like to see one too, I think Jumpmankicks.com should have a comparison up soon, he did it for the Hares and Carmines, so I hope these too.
- 28
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2007
That's a great idea, if the quality is on par then I will def be gettin a pair to ball in, but im on the fence for now... heard some bad things
- 487
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2001
this post cant get no love or the retro jumpman pros cant get no love?
- 487
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2001
Nobody on Niketalk can do a comparison?
- 2,181
- 1,264
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
Are they gonna have the white/black/gold colorway?
- 487
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2001
yes but the color blocking is not going to be the same. and they replaced the stitched jumpman with a solid silver jumpman so i dunno know aboutthe gold.
- 503
- 51
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2007
Are these available yet? If not, a Footlocker is in trouble.
They look ill, but I had to pass since I plan on getting the CDP 3/20, MotorSports, and Retro 1 High Laser and Doernbecher.
They look ill, but I had to pass since I plan on getting the CDP 3/20, MotorSports, and Retro 1 High Laser and Doernbecher.
- 18,412
- 5,848
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2003
I would have been able to make a comparison id i was not such a fool and sold a sample pair of the black/red's i had from 1997 at the start of this year
- 1,907
- 152
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2003
Saw them instore and they cheap felt
- 933
- 21
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2008
the ones I saw had a solid red bottom-looked fake
They should have made the clear-red bottom
They should have made the clear-red bottom
- 1,617
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2007
Here is my pair...and the difference that i see compared to "icopjordan23" picture is the sole is clear, and theLeather material
which looks WAY BETTER
- 5,339
- 11
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2005
if you someone sends me their OG pair ill be more than glad to do a comparison and testing wearing too! free of charge!!
- 1,561
- 12
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2007
OG: Stitched on side Jumpman.
Carbon fiber looks like Black/Red XI retro.
I guess, it has shorter toe box.
Retro: Rubber Jumpman glued on the side.
Clear carbon fiber, looks like car's part.
That's all I can think of.
Carbon fiber looks like Black/Red XI retro.
I guess, it has shorter toe box.
Retro: Rubber Jumpman glued on the side.
Clear carbon fiber, looks like car's part.
That's all I can think of.
blco02
Banned
- 3,932
- 1,281
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2001
OG's had a stiched Jumpman, retro's is chrome.
OG's Jumpman was angled, retro's is level.
OG's have a metal top eyelit, retro's is black and plastic.
OG's had real carbon fiber, retro's is fake.
OG's had nice leather, retro's is vastly inferior.
OG's outsole were translucent, retro's is solid colored.
I'm sure there are some more minor differences I haven't noticed.
OG's Jumpman was angled, retro's is level.
OG's have a metal top eyelit, retro's is black and plastic.
OG's had real carbon fiber, retro's is fake.
OG's had nice leather, retro's is vastly inferior.
OG's outsole were translucent, retro's is solid colored.
I'm sure there are some more minor differences I haven't noticed.
- 1,451
- 51
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2008
minor differences?
@ JB
- 204
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2008
I was gonna pick up a pair but when i saw them in person i was very disapointed. They seemed very cheaply made and the soles were nothing like the originals.The shoe looks nice but the quality just looks cheap.
- 1,617
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2007
yeah i wasnt going to buy them also but i really liked themo well...NTs most hated Pros now
- 5,238
- 4,833
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2005
Pretty much sums it up. No pics needed.
- 2,462
- 324
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2003
another difference is that the retro has a white outsole, while the og's had black. the inner liner was also blk and had no red in it.
i haven't examined the retros in detail, but this is another difference:
the wht/navyand blk/royal also had a stitched jumpman on the little trangle where the heel tab ended. the blk/wht/gold and blk/red had a little plasticbubble w/ a jumpman printed on it.
the retro jumpman pros look/are cheap. they should've kept them as close to retro as possible. the patent leather on the wht/navy look like crap!!! notonly that, the color placements suck too. i saw a pair of blk/yllw/wht at a foot locker and the stitching contrast was garbage and made the shoe look like ablind person put it together. the jumpman pro WAS a great shoe, but jordan/nike messed them up by making short cuts and letting the blind lead the blind. definately one of my all time favorite shoes, but the retros are goin to sit and then be shipped to outlets where they're goin to continue to sit untilthey drop to 50 or so a pair.
- 487
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2001
I also notices that the retros have a stiched jumpman on the back and the OG's had a round rubber jumpman like the tongue has.
- 476
- 11
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2005
Why did they have to mess these up so badly???????
- 1,308
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2003
Spot on. The only other difference I can think of is that the Jumpman in the heel on the OGs was bubbled. The Retro just has it stitched on.
- 2,462
- 324
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2003
^^^the last 2 or so post state the same thing but are only half right. as i posted before you guys, only the blk/wht/gold and the blk/red had a plastic bubbleand the wht/navy and blk/royal had a sewn jumpman. helps to read the posts prior to what you intend to sharel
- 1,308
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2003
^ Sry. I tend to overlook anything shaq related. No offense.
But how are the previous 2 posts only half right?
And I know those other colorways have the stitched jumpman..buuuuuut were ARE talking about the black/red colorway. Right?
But how are the previous 2 posts only half right?
And I know those other colorways have the stitched jumpman..buuuuuut were ARE talking about the black/red colorway. Right?
