Yup, with the 27th pick
Last time we used houstons pick we landed larry lance right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yup, with the 27th pick
Last time we used houstons pick we landed larry lance right?
Whip you got 6 hours dog
Houston dumped a bad contract on the Lakers for them to take a first rounder.
According to people on twitter, Momo said Magic saw Brewer as a sweetener. That better not be true, and the best first round option was the Houston pick.
Whip you got 6 hours dog
LOL...I already told all of you funny dudes last week to mark your calendars for Mon and Tues. Today is Tuesday and look what happened.
You still doubting the barbershop sources?
Okay...let me fill you in:
Lakers are most likely not done and are continuing to be aggressive.
Do you know which other player Corey Brewer's agent represents?
Keep your eyes peeled bruh...you never know what kind of magic tricks Dr. Buss' spirit got up his sleeve.
@ArashMarkazi For those wanting a better first round pick for Lou Williams, this was the best offer they got for the 2017 draft, which is especially deep.
Momo didn't say Magic thought it was a sweetner. I was listening to her.Exactly what I was afraid of. It should have cost them a small asset just to dump Brewer. Another 2nd or KJ should've been included. Magic goofed.
Yea I didn't listen to her, I just saw people say it on twitter. That's why I made sure to write that. The LFR tweeted that Momo said Magic saw him a sweetener in his eyes. Check out his twitter.Momo didn't say Magic thought it was a sweetner. I was listening to her.Exactly what I was afraid of. It should have cost them a small asset just to dump Brewer. Another 2nd or KJ should've been included. Magic goofed.
Most time the protections are put in place in a prediction of where said team trading is going to finish so they don't actually have to give it up. Well except in the Lakers case where they stupidly didn't think they'd be terrible when doing that Nash trade.
Just throwing it out there, how much worse could the protections be than 26-27. I guess it depends on what happens if the pick would fall within the protection. Does it rollover like our picks or do we outright lose it?
So this was the only trade that makes sense even if we had to take back Brewer. Putting Lou on any of those teams could theoretically mean we traded him for nothing.
Most time the protections are put in place in a prediction of where said team trading is going to finish so they don't actually have to give it up. Well except in the Lakers case where they stupidly didn't think they'd be terrible when doing that Nash trade.
Exactly.
So this was the only trade that makes sense even if we had to take back Brewer. Putting Lou on any of those teams could theoretically mean we traded him for nothing.
Thanks for stating the obvious MagicThe Lou trade was strategic in nature
I know what you meanThe Lou trade was strategic in nature. Brewer and that pick are "pieces" if you know what I mean
I don't think you can trade future draft picks in back to back years.I don't get it, how is Houston trading back to back 1st rounders? I thought you couldn't do that?
I guess they don't take into account the previous year.