- 9,996
- 200
Originally Posted by Xtapolapacetl
Originally Posted by knightngale
so you are saying that your argument that lebron would have won atlast 6 rings is valid cause he won during this shortened season with help from the refs?Originally Posted by Xtapolapacetl
They're not so much rings based on "imagination" but on analysis. Once again, if LeBron was drafted with a silver spoon in his mouth like Kobe and not been drafted into a franchise whose best achievement was one conference finals in 30 years of its existence, and you replace 20 year-old Kobe in the 1998-99 season with a 20 year-old LeBron who even at that point averaged 27, 7 and 7 and put him next to that Shaq, they would win about 6 rings in 8 seasons taking into consideration that LeBron wouldn't run Shaq out of town due to ball hogging.
Keep making fun of this statement. Before, you argued against it saying that it couldn't be true because LeBron is incapable of winning. After tonight, I would like to see your arguments against this claim again.
For years, you were sticking to the last desperate argument that essentially was saying that Chauncey Billups, Paul Pierce and Tony Parker were greater basketball players than LeBron. Now you don't even have that anymore.
those players now have the same number of rings that lebron has...wait parker still has more rings than Lebron and lebron will never win again
dude will stay chauncey billups status
Shortened season?
Crying about the refs?
Keep staying salty. Keep staying MAD!
at least billups was able to beat kobe in his career
in the finals