- 75
- 10
- Joined
- May 13, 2011
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=120748947533&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT
Need a legit/price check on these, thanks
Need a legit/price check on these, thanks
Legit/price check on 2001 bred 11s
- Thread in 'Archive: Jordan Brand Price/Fake Checks' Thread starter Started by cdn206,
- Start date
- 75
- 10
- Joined
- May 13, 2011
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=120748947533&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT
Need a legit/price check on these, thanks
Need a legit/price check on these, thanks
- 8,613
- 15,507
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2011
Im going with fake, The only reason I would have said they were legit is the carbon fiber but even that looks slightly off, maybe its the angle.
- The tow box looks like a pig snout
- the patent leather cut is too choppy and not smooth as suppose to be
- the Jumpman tab looks like its past the third loop, it looks like he manipulated to look like it was on the third loop.
- The tow box looks like a pig snout
- the patent leather cut is too choppy and not smooth as suppose to be
- the Jumpman tab looks like its past the third loop, it looks like he manipulated to look like it was on the third loop.
- 8,613
- 15,507
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2011
Im going with fake, The only reason I would have said they were legit is the carbon fiber but even that looks slightly off, maybe its the angle.
- The tow box looks like a pig snout
- the patent leather cut is too choppy and not smooth as suppose to be
- the Jumpman tab looks like its past the third loop, it looks like he manipulated to look like it was on the third loop.
- The tow box looks like a pig snout
- the patent leather cut is too choppy and not smooth as suppose to be
- the Jumpman tab looks like its past the third loop, it looks like he manipulated to look like it was on the third loop.
smoke 2x
Banned
- 268
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2011
i was looking at the to just to flip but didnt risk it they look legit and the toebox mite just be stuffed but i just dont like the shape i wouldnt pay for that
smoke 2x
Banned
- 268
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2011
i was looking at the to just to flip but didnt risk it they look legit and the toebox mite just be stuffed but i just dont like the shape i wouldnt pay for that
- 75
- 10
- Joined
- May 13, 2011
i sent him a message questioning its authenticity and he said he was certain that they were real and cussed me out lol. i told him to send more pics and if i get them ill post them on here, thanks for your answers guys.
- 75
- 10
- Joined
- May 13, 2011
i sent him a message questioning its authenticity and he said he was certain that they were real and cussed me out lol. i told him to send more pics and if i get them ill post them on here, thanks for your answers guys.
- 8,613
- 15,507
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2011
Damn why the hostility if they authentic? Lol. But yeah if they are real then the ankle area is pretty creased up and the toe box might be overstuffed because it prolly got a lot creasing.
- 8,613
- 15,507
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2011
Damn why the hostility if they authentic? Lol. But yeah if they are real then the ankle area is pretty creased up and the toe box might be overstuffed because it prolly got a lot creasing.
- 398
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2008
I'm going with fakes on those
the cut of the "leather" and allaround shoe just doesn't look right (there should be more of a slight curve where the patent leather meets the mesh near the front lace loops) and there's a seam on the inner right shoe that's in the wrong place plus there's probably a good reason why he didn't post pics of the 23 on the back or inner tag.
the cut of the "leather" and allaround shoe just doesn't look right (there should be more of a slight curve where the patent leather meets the mesh near the front lace loops) and there's a seam on the inner right shoe that's in the wrong place plus there's probably a good reason why he didn't post pics of the 23 on the back or inner tag.
- 398
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2008
I'm going with fakes on those
the cut of the "leather" and allaround shoe just doesn't look right (there should be more of a slight curve where the patent leather meets the mesh near the front lace loops) and there's a seam on the inner right shoe that's in the wrong place plus there's probably a good reason why he didn't post pics of the 23 on the back or inner tag.
the cut of the "leather" and allaround shoe just doesn't look right (there should be more of a slight curve where the patent leather meets the mesh near the front lace loops) and there's a seam on the inner right shoe that's in the wrong place plus there's probably a good reason why he didn't post pics of the 23 on the back or inner tag.
- 3,969
- 340
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2011
im going with real
they may be miss shapen and the pics are pretty bad quality but the cf checks out if you look closely enough. its not that checkerboarded plastic cf you can see the contrast of it if you look close. they seem to have the authentic thicker 11 laces rather than the laces of fakes which are usually thinner. i dont think those pics do the shoes justice.
they may be miss shapen and the pics are pretty bad quality but the cf checks out if you look closely enough. its not that checkerboarded plastic cf you can see the contrast of it if you look close. they seem to have the authentic thicker 11 laces rather than the laces of fakes which are usually thinner. i dont think those pics do the shoes justice.
- 3,969
- 340
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2011
im going with real
they may be miss shapen and the pics are pretty bad quality but the cf checks out if you look closely enough. its not that checkerboarded plastic cf you can see the contrast of it if you look close. they seem to have the authentic thicker 11 laces rather than the laces of fakes which are usually thinner. i dont think those pics do the shoes justice.
they may be miss shapen and the pics are pretty bad quality but the cf checks out if you look closely enough. its not that checkerboarded plastic cf you can see the contrast of it if you look close. they seem to have the authentic thicker 11 laces rather than the laces of fakes which are usually thinner. i dont think those pics do the shoes justice.
- 8,613
- 15,507
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2011
Yeah I hear what your saying GreyFoxx they have the characteristic of real ones and probably just creased up bad in the rear and toe box. That's the only reason that the toe box would look as mishappen and stuffed to the max lol. Either way if their fake or real but just creased up I would stay away unless seller sent better tagged pics and got a good price because it's really not risk the gamble IMO.
- 8,613
- 15,507
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2011
Yeah I hear what your saying GreyFoxx they have the characteristic of real ones and probably just creased up bad in the rear and toe box. That's the only reason that the toe box would look as mishappen and stuffed to the max lol. Either way if their fake or real but just creased up I would stay away unless seller sent better tagged pics and got a good price because it's really not risk the gamble IMO.
- 1,139
- 59
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2009
ima go with FAKE. never seen any 2001 breds with a ducklike toebox.
the patent leather cut is also sharp and edged, it should be smooth around the side panel..
the patent leather cut is also sharp and edged, it should be smooth around the side panel..
- 1,139
- 59
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2009
ima go with FAKE. never seen any 2001 breds with a ducklike toebox.
the patent leather cut is also sharp and edged, it should be smooth around the side panel..
the patent leather cut is also sharp and edged, it should be smooth around the side panel..
cash is king
Banned
- 569
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2011
they look aite but shape looks to fake to even touch i wouldnt
cash is king
Banned
- 569
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2011
they look aite but shape looks to fake to even touch i wouldnt
