iblink
Banned
- 6,497
- 468
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2008
Last night I was having a debate with a friend about Armageddon. I disagreed with her notion of 2012. She's a Christian, I'm agnostic.
I know I can get confusing in some of my threads/responses, so I'll break this down in premises. One question that I cannot get answered is this:shouldn't a Christian denounce notions of 2012, as it conflicts with their religion?
DISCLAIMER (I insist you all read this before you click the spoiler): This thread in not intended to criticize, chastise, or falsify any religion. It'sintent is to discover whether there is any truth to the idea of 2012.
I know I can get confusing in some of my threads/responses, so I'll break this down in premises. One question that I cannot get answered is this:shouldn't a Christian denounce notions of 2012, as it conflicts with their religion?
DISCLAIMER (I insist you all read this before you click the spoiler): This thread in not intended to criticize, chastise, or falsify any religion. It'sintent is to discover whether there is any truth to the idea of 2012.
Spoiler [+]
P1: The Mayan society was not one based upon a Christian deity, it was based upon multiple deities.
P2: Christianity is centered around a God who tells his worshipers to follow none other but himself
P3: To believe in the Mayan calender would suggest that you hold significant relevance for the calender, comparable to the relevance you hold for the bible; which teaches followers to accept no other Gods but him.
P4: To incorporate the two would mean that Christians are following a false idol, as the evidence from the Mayans is centered around a culture that idolized several deities who allowed for such predictions (like 2012) to be made.
P5: Having relevance for the calender would mean you hold relevance for Mayan deities.
Conclusion: Christians ought not to associate the theory of 2012 with the text found in Revelations.
P2: Christianity is centered around a God who tells his worshipers to follow none other but himself
P3: To believe in the Mayan calender would suggest that you hold significant relevance for the calender, comparable to the relevance you hold for the bible; which teaches followers to accept no other Gods but him.
P4: To incorporate the two would mean that Christians are following a false idol, as the evidence from the Mayans is centered around a culture that idolized several deities who allowed for such predictions (like 2012) to be made.
P5: Having relevance for the calender would mean you hold relevance for Mayan deities.
Conclusion: Christians ought not to associate the theory of 2012 with the text found in Revelations.