- 1,545
- 505
Didn't know Simmons was taller than randle...what do we do with him if we get ben?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If trading Randle is going to give you a **** return, what the hell you going to get for Nance?
If trading Randle is going to give you a **** return, what the hell you going to get for Nance?
Not looking for a good return. Isn't even about return. It's necessity of shifting your focus. But I can live with a **** return for a 27th pick. Can't for a 7th pick.
Also your hand is forced to trade Nance at that point. Couldn't make playing time even if you wanted to.
Scouts are now leaning towards Ingram as the best prospect available due to the fact the Ben doesn't have that inner drive in himself....
Not looking for a good return. Isn't even about return. It's necessity of shifting your focus. But I can live with a **** return for a 27th pick. Can't for a 7th pick.
Also your hand is forced to trade Nance at that point. Couldn't make playing time even if you wanted to.
Or you could trade Randle who's the more talented guy but also someone what needs the ball when you're theoretically adding another young guy who also needs the ball to be effective in Simmons. Nance on the other hand can be that Rick Fox git line CP has suggested before just a utility guy that doesn't have to have plays run to be effective. In his stint before the injury when he was in the starting lineup he was averaging close to a dbl-dbl as well. For someone that talks about fit all the time interesting that you take this stance.
Randle for Alex Len?I'm kinda leaning that same way, IF Ben is the guy, I think I move Randle because he has a larger contract early on, and Nance adds so many things off the bench that fit better than what Randle would add.
Now, Randle COULD change his game off the bench I suppose, and I wouldn't just give him away, but if we could get a decent return for him, a decent 22-23-24 year old young SF, or even a late 20's legit 7 foot Center, I would consider it.
But depends on how the pieces drop. Perfect world we just get Ingram and add #32 to the mix and sort it all out in FA with lots of cap. If it's Ben, then we're gonna have to dig in a lil deeper.
Bleacher ReportJohn Ireland give you this inside info? Cause as usual is wrong.
I'm kinda leaning that same way, IF Ben is the guy, I think I move Randle because he has a larger contract early on, and Nance adds so many things off the bench that fit better than what Randle would add.
Now, Randle COULD change his game off the bench I suppose, and I wouldn't just give him away, but if we could get a decent return for him, a decent 22-23-24 year old young SF, or even a late 20's legit 7 foot Center, I would consider it.
But depends on how the pieces drop. Perfect world we just get Ingram and add #32 to the mix and sort it all out in FA with lots of cap. If it's Ben, then we're gonna have to dig in a lil deeper.
Randle for Alex Len?
Him and randle have very similar games, Simmons is just a better passer & maybe a lil quicker
He actually has the skill set that Julius believes he possesses.
He literally does everything better than Julius.
That's not bad at all, but I doubt highly that the Suns would do it. I highly doubt it. But that's not a terrible thought on our end.
That's not bad at all, but I doubt highly that the Suns would do it. I highly doubt it. But that's not a terrible thought on our end.
Since they apparently want to go back to 3 scoring PGs again send them Clarkson and Randle for Booker and Len
You know Booker is untouchable at this point.