Man taking one step closer towards immortality... Vol. Playing God..?

fog

3,449
18
Joined
Aug 1, 2011
[h1][/h1]
[h1]Cloning of human organs a step closer
[/h1]

By Nick Collins, The Daily TelegraphOctober 5, 2011

The cloning of human organs has moved a step closer after scientists in New York used a controversial technique to create embryonic stem cells in the lab for the first time.

Researchers took DNA from an adult skin cell and injected it into a human egg, producing an early-stage embryo before extracting stem cells.

Test tube embryos have been made before but the latest experiment, using a similar method to the one that produced Dolly the sheep, is thought to be the most successful yet.

The cells produced could not be safely transplanted into humans, however, because they developed with too many chromosomes.

Previous attempts to create early-stage embryos using the technique have stalled because the cells stopped multiplying.

This time they developed far enough to enable researchers to extract stem cells, which can multiply and turn themselves into any other cell type. If researchers can perfect the technique it could lead to a new generation of medical treatments because doctors could grow healthy cells to replace diseased tissue using a patient's own DNA, cutting the risk of them being rejected by the body.

The subject is highly controversial because there are concerns that it could lead to attempts by maverick doctors to produce cloned babies, in breach of ethical regulations. Hwang Woo-suk, a South Korean scientist, has claimed to have generated stem cells from cloned human embryos, but his evidence was later found to be bogus.

Dr Dieter Egli, one of the authors of the research team's report, which was published in the journal Nature, said there was a "great question mark" over whether the technique could be developed enough to be used safely in humans.

The method, known as somatic cell nuclear transfer, involves taking the nucleus of a human skin cell and transferring it into an egg cell to create an embryo.

In animals such as sheep, researchers remove the egg DNA before replacing it with the nucleus of the animal cell, but in humans this stops the egg from developing into more than six to 12 cells. Researchers led by Dr Scott Noggle, of the New York Stem Cell Foundation Laboratory, found that if they left the egg cell's DNA intact and added the skin cell nucleus, the early embryo continued developing to a stage where stem cells were produced.

These were then removed and cultivated to produce several different types of cell.

The downside of the method is it means the resulting cells have three chromosomes rather than two, which could lead to serious health complications.

Embryos which have the wrong number of chromosomes often fail to develop, while having three versions of a particular chromosome causes Down's syndrome.

But the researchers in New York hope that they will be able to find a way of refining the technique to generate stem cells containing only DNA from the donor cell.

Prof Mary Herbert, from the Institute for Aging and Health at Newcastle University, said: "This study shows that the conventional approach to somatic cell nuclear transfer is inefficient in humans.

"However, the authors were able to increase the efficiency by leaving the host oocyte [egg] genome in place.

"While this approach does not in itself provide a solution, it takes us a step closer to understanding where the problems lie."


First thing that came to mind was using this technology to replace cancerous organs with new ones... Think of the possibilities..
eek.gif


But then again, this DOES go against human ethics. What is NT's take on this?
 
anyone who is interested in topics like this should check out Ray Kurzweil.. some of his theories are little ahead of their time but he makes a lot of valid points that deserve a lot of attention.

read up on his book: Singularity is Near

watch the movie: transcendent man - I believe it's on Netflix stream
 
Its like Repo Men. If we cant make payments on our credit cards, they take our stuff. Now imagine if you cant pay for your artificial organs.
 
This is just pushing it... 
I know lives can be saved or helped but damn, when it's your time it's your time! 
ohwell.gif
 
I dont think its ethically wrong. We are advancing has a species, thats what we do. We're just gonna need to up our space technology, find habitable planets, and get to em so we got room to fit everybody lol. Overpopulation will be a problem and its gonna limit how much we can use this technology which will then slow down the pace that are technology grows.

!$%# im trying to live as long as possible and see as much as possible.

Does this stuff help treat our senses though? I think the number one thing we should be focusing on is being able to cure being blind, deaf, etc.
 
I made this post on a similar subject off an idea that I had one day and kids were acting like I had gone crazy. I dont think a lot of people realize how defining the times are that we live in. Prepare to have your mind blown with some of the advancements and discoveries of our lifetime... Which could be many, many years...
Originally Posted by supa vegetto

anyone who is interested in topics like this should check out Ray Kurzweil.. some of his theories are little ahead of their time but he makes a lot of valid points that deserve a lot of attention.

read up on his book: Singularity is Near

watch the movie: transcendent man - I believe it's on Netflix stream

No doubt. Good intel.
Originally Posted by cartune

You 99%ers wont be able to afford it tho

eek.gif
roll.gif
 
Originally Posted by Icecixz

Its like Repo Men. If we cant make payments on our credit cards, they take our stuff. Now imagine if you cant pay for your artificial organs.

 
Back
Top Bottom