arstyle27
Supporter
- 10,343
- 3,425
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2001
That catch by Wise was amazing. Buehrle is awesome, even though he plays for the Sox.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Kiddin Like Jason:
If he doesn't make that catch, that game is reduced to something that has happened dozens of times instead of something has now happened 18 times.
And if the catch wasn't to save a perfect game, he probably still makes it. That's my issue.
It's a catch we've seen plenty of times. It wasn't a once-in-a-lifetime, unexplainable catch that will never happen again.
You guys collect Nikes; you should know that the more there are, the less it is worth.
Exactly; the more there are, the less it is worth.
Problem is, you're reducing it to just a catch. 'Well, it was. The ball was in the air, then it was in his glove. That's a catch. Happens all thetime.'
How many perfect-game-preserving, 9th inning catches at the wall can you think of? Of course there are 'at the wall' and 'over the wall'catches weekly, but how many of them are in the 9th inning of a perfect game? He doesn't make that catch, it's either a double or a homerun, reducingthe game to either a potential one-hit shutout (assuming the double never turns into a run) or just a one-hit, 5-1 victory.
The surrounding circumstance definitely count. You're a big enough fan of sports to know that if you hit 100 freethrows in a row, then before your next one, I tell you I'll give a million if you hit, or you give me everything you own if you miss, you deserve a TON ofcredit for hitting it if you do. "Why would he deserve any credit? It was just a free throw, and he had just hit a hundred of them." P-shaw.![]()
Glad to know you're a part of the majority.Originally Posted by Dr 715
���
I don't get why most of you are gushing over the fact that he bobbled the ball. Wise didn't scale the wall to make that catch - he didn't reach over . Wise jumped straight up, caught the ball and his momentum carried his glove past the fence. The ball should have landed in the webbing of his glove and he should have squeezed it. By failing to do that, he made it a more difficult play for himself.
Now Granderson got UP for his catch and caught it cleanly - don't even lie to yourself, that wall at Progressive Field is at least 2-3 feet taller than the wall in Chicago. And for the record, this was a game-saving catch too. Granderson didn't save a perfect game, but he without a doubt robbed Sizemore of a walk-off homerun. Wise's catch didn't get his team the win, it saved a personal achievement for his teammate. The White Sox were up 5 runs and it was the top of the 9th, so the White Sox were well�on their way to winning that game.�Granderson got his team the win with�that play alone.�It can be argued (with intellegent folks of course, so that rules out 95% of this forum) that Granderson's catch, setting included, is more impressive.
PlatinumFunk wrote:
Glad to know you're a part of the majority.Originally Posted by Dr 715
���
I don't get why most of you are gushing over the fact that he bobbled the ball. Wise didn't scale the wall to make that catch - he didn't reach over . Wise jumped straight up, caught the ball and his momentum carried his glove past the fence. The ball should have landed in the webbing of his glove and he should have squeezed it. By failing to do that, he made it a more difficult play for himself.
Now Granderson got UP for his catch and caught it cleanly - don't even lie to yourself, that wall at Progressive Field is at least 2-3 feet taller than the wall in Chicago. And for the record, this was a game-saving catch too. Granderson didn't save a perfect game, but he without a doubt robbed Sizemore of a walk-off homerun. Wise's catch didn't get his team the win, it saved a personal achievement for his teammate. The White Sox were up 5 runs and it was the top of the 9th, so the White Sox were well�on their way to winning that game.�Granderson got his team the win with�that play alone.�It can be argued (with intellegent folks of course, so that rules out 95% of this forum) that Granderson's catch, setting included, is more impressive.
�You should probably know I tried 25480 times to embed that damn videoand lost just as many well written posts.![]()
Mez 0ne:
If you want to just analyze the catch as just a normal catch and throw out the "perfect game" aspect of it, then its just a great play but nothing special.
But I don't see the point of discussing that cause it doesn't really get us anywhere.![]()
Exactly. Sure someone can isolate the play and analyze it on it's own, but I think that's a little nit-picky and naive, in my opinion,because it wasn't just a regular ol' catch out there at the wall. It was a catch in the 9th inning of a perfect game. I don't understand saying itwas less than that when that's exactly what it was.
Originally Posted by sickickz23
^ nope
to the guy slurping Hunter, Rowand and Granderson, Wise is better, you're wrong, face it, deal with it, or log off. You're 100% wrong and that's not an opinion. That's a fact.
Soriano would have never evvvvver made that catch
Asking for trouble![]()
Asking for trouble