- Feb 7, 2016
- 13,286
- 10,780
They are banning backpacks and not guns ?
Mass Shooting Thread: Waiting on the next one.
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by MalcolmNewton,
- Start date
They are banning backpacks and not guns ?
- Jan 16, 2011
- 15,143
- 36,962
I agree with everything you said, and everything you said refutes the "good guy with a gun" argument. And yet, the pro-gun crowd has been using this argument for a very long time with no serious pushback.
Arming everybody was meant to make red states safer, and mass shootings have gone up 60% in TX since Abbott relaxed requirements to get guns.
- Oct 14, 2008
- 14,029
- 13,584
This is America
- Oct 14, 2008
- 14,029
- 13,584
Don’t worry the goalpost will move 100 yards to make this work soon enough.
- Jan 16, 2011
- 15,143
- 36,962
Watch the TX legislature make "mass shooting" a protected term by legally requiring a minimum body count, the same way you can't use "champagne" for any sparkling wine made outside the region of the same name.
- May 12, 2011
- 3,278
- 3,064
It does not refute it. There are many situations where the “good guy with a gun” stopped the “bad guy with a gun”. The “good guy with a gun” statement doesnt mean in every situation lawful gun owners are rambo going head on towards an active shooter. Also, some state laws make it illegal for lawful gun carriers to go towards the threat and engage. They are only lawfully allowed to use their gun in self defense, not in the defense of strangers. Thats why that person made the statement about repercussions and lawsuits.
Im not going to go back and forth, but you shouldn’t be misinformed. Now you know why they made that statement.
Last edited:
- Jan 16, 2011
- 15,143
- 36,962
Goal post move.
That's not what the pro-gun crowd has been saying. There was never any nuance in this statement.
The results of loosening gun laws speak for themselves. You can keep your blinders on.
- May 12, 2011
- 3,278
- 3,064
The people who make the statement aren’t responsible for your understanding of any nuances or understanding of state gun laws. But now you have a little more information on why the good guys were “hiding from the fire”. Ironically, alot of good guys with guns are lawfully bound to retreat and not engage because of………stricter gun laws that say you cant legally shoot at someone whos shooting at other people
Last edited:
Nike Jordan
Supporter
- Jun 27, 2002
- 34,200
- 82,014
It's the guns.
- Apr 9, 2017
- 17,249
- 48,078
Im sure guns are already banned in 99% of all schools unless youre an armed guard... but you know that.
- Feb 7, 2016
- 13,286
- 10,780
Need more prayers.
- Feb 7, 2016
- 13,286
- 10,780
The reality is that the GGG narrative is exactly what the conservatives is pushing for especially if they were so vocal of defunding the police. Rittenmouse even got away with manslaughter after killing an unarmed civilian. also the fact that they were pushing for teachers to have guns and play rambo. the unarmed parents of the Uvalde massacre victims even tried to rescue their children. point is, gun lovers are nothing more than posers trying to justify their guns for self-defense. in most instances, gun use are more often used in massacres and angry disputes. stricter gun laws such as you've mentioned has nothing to do with them being afraid to be held liable of killing other people. they ain't it.The people who make the statement aren’t responsible for your understanding of any nuances or understanding of state gun laws. But now you have a little more information on why the good guys were “hiding from the fire”. Ironically, alot of good guys with guns are lawfully bound to retreat and not engage because of………stricter gun laws that say you cant legally shoot at someone whos shooting at other people
- Jan 16, 2011
- 15,143
- 36,962
The people who make the statement aren’t responsible for your understanding of any nuances or understanding of state gun laws. But now you have a little more information on why the good guys were “hiding from the fire”. Ironically, alot of good guys with guns are lawfully bound to retreat and not engage because of………stricter gun laws that say you cant legally shoot at someone whos shooting at other people
I've been talking about the logic of the "good guy with a gun" argument, and it's a flawed argument because of everything you keep saying.
And yet, this has been the solution of choice of republican politicians after every mass shooting: arm everybody.
The 'Good Guys With Guns' Keep Failing to Stop Mass Shootings
In the 10 years since Sandy Hook, "good guys with guns" have been present or nearby at nearly every major mass shooting.
time.com
See?
No nuances in the logic.
- Sep 5, 2010
- 94,387
- 132,065
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,682
- 203,227
- Feb 25, 2010
- 24,954
- 23,302
New Mexico shooting: 3 dead, 2 wounded in Farmington attack
Three “civilian victims” were killed, Farmington police said, in addition to a suspect who was “confronted and killed on scene.”
www.nbcnews.com
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,682
- 203,227
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,682
- 203,227
- Jan 16, 2016
- 8,736
- 8,756
Go beat his ***. **** it. I'm exhausted of dumb ****s.
- Nov 7, 2019
- 7,727
- 24,327
Thing is, he might up it expeditiously
- Jul 3, 2015
- 6,024
- 7,100
This would not be a smart idea considering what he’s carrying
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,682
- 203,227
Mister Meaner
formerly super producer j
- Mar 24, 2007
- 20,535
- 10,995
Nope, not curious at all.
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,682
- 203,227
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,682
- 203,227
