Yeah I'm not disagreeing with how someone defines a better career, but moreso just the point that Dray hasn't really had "individual accolades" that propels him over Dwight (in addition to other things), other than rings. And it's fine if that's how people want to define a career. I think in a vacuum that's probably right but on a player-to-player basis I feel like there's a bit more nuance. Dwight was legit a top 5 player for over half a decade.
Dray still has a lot of time to rack up more accolades and make this argument null tho. Up to this point I still think Dwight has had a better individual career. I know Dray is essential to the W's makeup and winning but if you add nuance it's hard to take away from Dwight being a top 5 player for over half a decade and being the best player and go-to option on a Finals team. Dude legit ****ed up a Bron-Kobe finals. You are right in that rings is why this is even a debate, which is honestly what I was kinda alluding to originally...