- 38,930
- 54,907
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2014
smh at this thread...why are yall caping for this man? just makes you look stupid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
smh at this thread...why are yall caping for this man? just makes you look stupid.
Jurors in the Bill Cosby trial said Thursday they are deadlocked and cannot come to a unanimous consensus on any of the three counts of aggravated indecent assault the comedian faces.
Judge Steven O'Neill asked the jury to go back to deliberating in another attempt to reach consensus.
"I am required to read you an instruction. The jury foreman has informed me that you are deadlocked," O'Neill said. "If you are still deadlocked you should report that to me. If you've reached a unanimous decision on some of the charges, please report that back to me."
There is no limit to how many times a judge can issue the Spencer Charge, which is a set of instructions that asks jurors to re-examine their own views and opinions. The charge is also known as the Allen Charge in other states. If they still cannot reach consensus, a hung jury will cause the judge to declare a mistrial.
The jury has deliberated for about 31 hours in all
Exactly, you cant believe anything these celebrities say....unfortunately its like the boy who cried wolf. All the publicity stunts and what not get old, and no one listens to you after awhile.all funny until it happens to someone you love...i made a thread about my wife being assaulted and was amazed that so many other users knew somebody close to them that was assaulted...
but if you come in a thread where it is a celebrity that's being accused dudes make jokes towards the women..then the thread turns to false accusations...***** amazing
Im sorry but until at least ONE of these allegations stick I dont believe any of them.
All of the women who have "come forward" so far not only were heavy into the party/drug scene but they also kept in contact with him after the fact.
Im sorry, I wanted to believe them but I cant....I just cant
Im sorry but until at least ONE of these allegations stick I dont believe any of them.
All of the women who have "come forward" so far not only were heavy into the party/drug scene but they also kept in contact with him after the fact.
Im sorry, I wanted to believe them but I cant....I just cant
The easiest way to destroy a person's reputation is to accuse that person of crimes that sicken the population. It's a bit too coincidental that when Cosby was making a play to purchase NBC, this avalanche of accusers came forward. Now with all that being said; I'm not saying Cosby didn't participate in some questionable activities with women over the years, that's been established for the record. It's just that I'm personally not willing to crucify a person so quickly like a lot of you guys in here have been doing since the jump. I'm also not of the school of thought that is name calling these women either. There's definitely a lot more to this than being accused and them immediately being guilty in the court of public opinion. People (quite a few in here) were quick fast to say he's guilty without knowing all of the facts.Why does BIll Cosby get the benefit of the doubt over those women?
What's more plausible? That these women all got together and orchestrated this massive lie to take down Cosby? Or that Cosby himself, a single person, is telling the lie?
The easiest way to destroy a person's reputation is to accuse that person of crimes that sicken the population. It's a bit too coincidental that when Cosby was making a play to purchase NBC, this avalanche of accusers came forward. Now with all that being said; I'm not saying Cosby didn't participate in some questionable activities with women over the years, that's been established for the record. It's just that I'm personally not willing to crucify a person so quickly like a lot of you guys in here have been doing since the jump. I'm also not of the school of thought that is name calling these women either. There's definitely a lot more to this than being accused and them immediately being guilty in the court of public opinion. People (quite a few in here) were quick fast to say he's guilty without knowing all of the facts.
source?
All of the women who have "come forward" so far not only were heavy into the party/drug scene
The easiest way to destroy a person's reputation is to accuse that person of crimes that sicken the population. It's a bit too coincidental that when Cosby was making a play to purchase NBC, this avalanche of accusers came forward. Now with all that being said; I'm not saying Cosby didn't participate in some questionable activities with women over the years, that's been established for the record. It's just that I'm personally not willing to crucify a person so quickly like a lot of you guys in here have been doing since the jump. I'm also not of the school of thought that is name calling these women either. There's definitely a lot more to this than being accused and them immediately being guilty in the court of public opinion. People (quite a few in here) were quick fast to say he's guilty without knowing all of the facts.Why does BIll Cosby get the benefit of the doubt over those women?
What's more plausible? That these women all got together and orchestrated this massive lie to take down Cosby? Or that Cosby himself, a single person, is telling the lie?
What facts "prove" the allegations is the duty of the prosecution, not the other way around. Society is so cynical that they're quick to expect the accused to prove their innocence. The justice system in our country doesn't work that way. This was a mess from the very start and if you think about it, was the perfect way to smear someone.What "facts" disproves the allegations...?
the case is just character assassination on both sides...
Unless you're a top executive at Comcast, your words don't hold any weight on that claim.Bill Cosby was not trying to buy NBC in 2014. That is false.
Please elaborate on this. You think people who are accused should burden the proof of innocence? So guilty until proven innocent?the way the law is written is the problem...
Unless you're a top executive at Comcast, your words don't hold any weight on that claim.
Please elaborate on this. You think people who are accused should burden the proof of innocence? So guilty until proven innocent?