- Jan 18, 2004
- 2,038
- 3,387
Nike Air Jordan Retro 3 OG “Fire Red” 2022
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Jordanbball,
- Start date
- Apr 25, 2005
- 33,428
- 39,205
- Mar 6, 2019
- 1,460
- 5,037
These look insanely close
- Dec 7, 2015
- 2,260
- 7,418
Close or not, it's irrelevant to me because I'm not buying these from anywhere but SNKRS and FTL.
- Aug 11, 2015
- 9,749
- 14,267
And this is why I'm waiting for the release date it's scary out here and I'm glad going to hang it up soon and just buy what I really like but they got the recipe for sure
- Feb 23, 2014
- 3,123
- 5,946
I definitely don’t buy replicas but you’re in denial. These could pass as retail, especially before the actually release
TipsyMcStagga
formerly kod843
- Aug 1, 2011
- 12,657
- 15,391
Yea I refuse to knowingly buy reps either but I can definitely see how rep pairs can slip through the verification process on Stock X/GOAT.
They need to train their employees better.
They need to train their employees better.
You're projecting brother. Just because you can't spot reps doesn't mean everyone else can't.
- Feb 23, 2014
- 3,123
- 5,946
Nah…they are pretty close if not better
Me not being able to spot reps (which isn’t the case) is null because I never buy on the resale market. No matter what.
You really can't tell these are reps brother? Or are you trolling meNah…they are pretty close if not better
Me not being able to spot reps (which isn’t the case) is null because I never buy on the resale market. No matter what.
- Feb 17, 2016
- 2,144
- 3,612
I don’t care admitting, I have a hard time spotting fakes.
Gotdam JB spent 10+ years making fakes of their own shoes.
Sometimes genuine pairs look sketch due to QC misses.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Gotdam JB spent 10+ years making fakes of their own shoes.
Sometimes genuine pairs look sketch due to QC misses.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- Feb 23, 2014
- 3,123
- 5,946
The leather looks exactly like the plastic coated leather on the BC3s…only reason you’re saying Rep is because it’s from a confirmed seller.
List your take on why these are reps that can’t be explained away by Nikes terrible QC issues.
- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,739
- 24,101
Back EP should not be double stitched. Top photo is.
- Apr 18, 2006
- 4,397
- 13,174
But but what if reps actually had the thinner elephant print 
- Aug 11, 2015
- 9,749
- 14,267
Damn near spot on can the authenticators tell and highlight the difference just askingNah…they are pretty close if not better
Me not being able to spot reps (which isn’t the case) is null because I never buy on the resale market. No matter what.
- Nov 15, 2020
- 1,091
- 1,401
That’s just an armchair legit checker statement out of the blue. 99% of folks can’t legit check for **** without side by side retail pair. Even then there are tolerances variation to go by along with different factory Qc
This is my retail Cardinal., racer and amm3 And they’re from Nike
Attachments
Last edited:
- Jan 18, 2004
- 2,038
- 3,387
- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,739
- 24,101
OGs were single stitched. Your pairs are not OG colors so they will not be the same. The new Fire reds will be single stitched.
- Feb 23, 2014
- 3,123
- 5,946
- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,739
- 24,101
Look at your BC3.Look at all the other recent 3s…it’s double stitched
- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,739
- 24,101
Then look at some true originals online. Nike does all these changes by design.
- Feb 23, 2014
- 3,123
- 5,946
Nike all over the place. No wonder people get scammed with Reps so easily
- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,739
- 24,101
It appears that way at times. But in fact, they know exactly what they are doing.
- Feb 23, 2014
- 3,123
- 5,946
I highly doubt that stitch was to throw off Rep factories, because they've had hands on Legit pairs before Nike did
