- 13,330
- 11,573
They look nice. Soles are too blue but wouldn't stop me from copping. 
Nike Air Jordan Retro Metallic V - 7/23/16
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by ozuna23,
- Start date
- 10,321
- 8,214
You hope they come out a week before your bday
x-alt
Banned
- 1,216
- 236
Solution: Wear them and turn them into a fresh yellow.They look nice. Soles are too blue but wouldn't stop me from copping.
Last edited:
- 13,330
- 11,573
Solution: Wear them and turn them into a fresh yellow.They look nice. Soles are too blue but wouldn't stop me from copping.
Yeah I know. I just don't like how the blue looks on them. But I do love how that NA looks on them
x-alt
Banned
- 1,216
- 236
Good thing is thst the NA isn't HUGE and lowriding like the OGs. Looks fresh.Yeah I know. I just don't like how the blue looks on them. But I do love how that NA looks on them
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
Guess my comment about these new pics being fakes and y'all getting hyped up or early GM pairs went over y'all heads. I'm not getting hyped until a few months.
- 13,330
- 11,573
Pretty much all the early pics are GM pairs but you can get a good idea what they will look like. You act like your the only one that knows that
- 8,522
- 1,696
$220 
- 895
- 739
The Leather will make or break for me...fingerz crossed
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
you could've fooled me. you all are commenting about the toe box, Nike air and the blue sole, and the toe box as if it's there actual pairPretty much all the early pics are GM pairs but you can get a good idea what they will look like. You act like your the only one that knows that
And after y'all clowned Marz for essentially doing the same thing in the Cement 4s thread hmm.......
- 64,964
- 196,091
- 13,330
- 11,573
Yeah because the retail pairs will look completely different |I
x-alt
Banned
- 1,216
- 236
2000 and 2006 is where it's at at. 2011+ is garbage, and I don't mind 1990.2006 is nailing it now
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
not going to debate on how nice and close these early pairs are. The Nike preview sample show shows no blue sole, thinner Durabuck cuts, and an outline where the collar bump is but hey, I guess that's the same View media item 1955488View media item 1955489
- 64,964
- 196,091
2000 and 2006 is where it's at at. 2011+ is garbage, and I don't mind 1990.2006 is nailing it now
I'm alluding to the sad state of affairs we are in that "2006" is nailing it. When JB can truly "nail" it if they truly wanted to
x-alt
Banned
- 1,216
- 236
2006 quality isn't particularly bad, but it's kinda disappointing to see this as the pinnacle of their "remaster". I'm talking about 2000/6 vs boot or OG toebox which is sort of a preferential thing. I do see quality being between the 2000 and 2006 pairs in terms of craftsmanship. But you know, they'll never fix the netting they somehow made yellow on all retro pairs.
Last edited:
SlamShut
formerly cement greyman
- 5,195
- 7,035
Damn these are looking nice.
- 2,210
- 3,578
These ***** look spectacular. Makes you wonder why they couldn't have just stuck to this since the beginning. All the crappy retro's, all the wack materials and unnecessary changes
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
Yah are crazy lol
- 2,715
- 9,057
That's that NikeTalk logic @jaylaw15...
I know they're GM's, as I posted the WC 4's from that site @jaylaw15. I wasn't sure at the time I did though...
I agree with you 100%, as I look more the SwishSupply pics. They desperately need whatever that material is, on ankle bump/collar.
However, it still is beautiful, and nice.... To see Nike Air on the heel, and on the bottom of the shoe.
The Nike Logo looks so perfect on the bottom of the shoe.
I never liked the Jordan logo, nor the font they used... When these come out, my 2011's will become SUPER beaters!!!
Last edited:
- 1,804
- 500
Just being on this site we're winning... Any info is good.... Lets enjoy this my guy's...
- 149
- 16
These look good
- 4,206
- 2,409
Hopefully the kids pairs will have Nike again so I can grab lil man a pair too.
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
People are out here scamming folks for these early pairs smh
View media item 1955755
View media item 1955755
Last edited:
Chill Bill
formerly ihaveaquestion
- 3,717
- 2,248
Jaylaw phone always be on a low battery and have Bluetooth on
No shots fired fam
No shots fired fam
