- 15,780
- 12,149
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2006
^ lol thats what im sayin, why would i pay over a $100 for a shoe that looks worn already, nvr was a fan of the vintage treatment i like my new shoes to look brand new
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by mints
Originally Posted by green rhino123
i don't know what nike has against retro'ing the wht/grey/navy blue-red original colorway
instead of the wht/grey/red 100 times
http://sneakernews.com/20.../nike-air-max-1-vintage/
it looks like those might be coming out with the vintage treatment too. I'm shocked they're not dropping this year for the 25th Anniversary, but oh well.
Originally Posted by AirThompson
The vintage sole is a dealbreaker as always.
Originally Posted by hellaones
Originally Posted by AirThompson
The vintage sole is a dealbreaker as always.
Originally Posted by trethousandgt
Both will be Copped, wish they would do this with Jordan's and then throw Nike Air on the back
these will probably still be painted...with piss yellow "vintage" paint. Probably the same process they used for the "vintage" AM Lights from last year. So disappointed with that shoe, wanted to cop, but that pee stained midsole just looked horrendous.Originally Posted by WallyHopp
So are these discounted in price? The yellowed midsole is basically an unpainted midsole, just raw foam. That's gotta be at least $5 off in price.