- 2,274
- 848
Bruh post pics
Just letting you know the Ultraboost has durability issues...
Mine cracked after 4 months of light jogging, running and just walking around town.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bruh post pics
Just letting you know the Ultraboost has durability issues...
Mine cracked after 4 months of light jogging, running and just walking around town.
So much for the best running shoe ever made.
Just letting you know the Ultraboost has durability issues...
Mine cracked after 4 months of light jogging, running and just walking around town.
Nice, but you forgot the T in Knit playa.
Yeah, that's what I heard too. Man I wish I knew that. They were great for the first half.Lunar isn't the best cushioning system for long days on your feet since the foam compresses under your weight. Zoom Air is better suited for that.
LOL. Good catchM U L T I C O L O R L U N A R 3 F L Y K N I F R I D A Y
Nice, but you forgot the T in Knit playa.
View media item 1579842
Got my id's in. Looks like I got a crazy amount of blue on one shoe and the other looks kinda plain. What do you guys think?
For those of you who want to read more about all the problems the Adidas Ultra Boost is having, including durability issues, go read the reviews on the Adidas site.
http://www.adidas.com/us/ultra-boost-shoes/B27172.html
Definately eye opening.
Agreed. I love mine and I got three pairs. This ain't the thread for this crap anyway, take that anti Adidas agenda elsewhere, eckomaniaTons of positive reviews, only a couple durability issues posted as I read thru a few pages. And that won't be an issue for me as I will just use it for casual wear, no running.
Agreed. I love mine and I got three pairs. This ain't the thread for this crap anyway, take that anti Adidas agenda elsewhere, eckomania
Thanks, besides them wearing out fast I didn't have the problems you describe with the 1's. I hear a lot of people who like the 2 better for running. If the sole of the 3 is the same, I will not try them. Money saved I guess!IMO, the FL2s were definitely superior to the 1s for running. For me, the 1s felt pretty clunky and loose. Their tongue kept sliding on me giving it a sloppy fit. Not only that, their soles wore significantly fast [emoji]128533[/emoji] (200mi). They're definitely a nice looking shoe, and I love wearing them casually, but I think they're overrated for running.
The 2s, on the hand(foot), felt a lot sleeker and faster. Their tongue is attached, so you don't have to worry about sloppy fit. Their soles are definitely more firm and last longer. Since the 2s and 3s share the same sole, I wouldn't expect the experience to be significantly different... If you want to run in a Flyknit and don't want to spend too much, the FL2 is the shoe for you, IMO [emoji]128077[/emoji][emoji]127996[/emoji]
They weren't truly MC. They were only orange and green.So the MC pair that Nike released (Not ID pairs) are more orange?