- 2,238
- 812
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2015
Bruh post pics
Nike Flyknit Lunar3 ( 698181) March 1st 2015
- 12,354
- 4,723
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2004
Lunar isn't the best cushioning system for long days on your feet since the foam compresses under your weight. Zoom Air is better suited for that.
- 7,694
- 7,729
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2004
M U L T I C O L O R L U N A R 3 F L Y K N I T F R I D A Y
Last edited:
- 4,391
- 2,646
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2013
^^^
awesome bro..
awesome bro..
- 22,642
- 47,680
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2005
Lulz!
WOW. I'd like to see pics. That's pretty interesting because the original energy boost were tested to log over 1,000mi. You'd think with more boost material they'd be even more durable...
- 4,201
- 1,474
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2014
The boost material may last that long but the outsole definitely will not
- 839
- 158
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2014
Imo these are great all day shoes but that's just me. I only weigh 145 lbs too so that could be a factor. Lol
- 33,260
- 38,888
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
- 4,391
- 2,646
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2013
Nice, but you forgot the T in Knit playa.
I'm sure we've all misspelled Flyknit Friday once or twice..
Last edited:
- 4,692
- 723
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2007
Yeah, that's what I heard too. Man I wish I knew that. They were great for the first half.
- 7,694
- 7,729
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2004
LOL. Good catch
- 839
- 158
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2014
Not to "knit"pic but it now reads F L Y K N T I lol
ootherocoo
ootherocoo
- 7,694
- 7,729
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2004
- 571
- 92
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2013
Bery nice bery nice....I like I like
- 335
- 400
- Joined
- May 20, 2015
View media item 1579842
Got my id's in. Looks like I got a crazy amount of blue on one shoe and the other looks kinda plain. What do you guys think?
Got my id's in. Looks like I got a crazy amount of blue on one shoe and the other looks kinda plain. What do you guys think?
- 17
- 22
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2012
For those of you who want to read more about all the problems the Adidas Ultra Boost is having, including durability issues, go read the reviews on the Adidas site.
http://www.adidas.com/us/ultra-boost-shoes/B27172.html
Definately eye opening.
http://www.adidas.com/us/ultra-boost-shoes/B27172.html
Definately eye opening.
- 1,061
- 189
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2003
- 10,240
- 2,966
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2009
Tons of positive reviews, only a couple durability issues posted as I read thru a few pages. And that won't be an issue for me as I will just use it for casual wear, no running.
- 839
- 158
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2014
Agreed. I love mine and I got three pairs. This ain't the thread for this crap anyway, take that anti Adidas agenda elsewhere,
eckomania
- 2,999
- 399
- Joined
- May 10, 2004
So the MC pair that Nike released (Not ID pairs) are more orange?
- 689
- 677
- Joined
- May 10, 2015
Agreed. I love mine and I got three pairs. This ain't the thread for this crap anyway, take that anti Adidas agenda elsewhere,
I guess everybody just reads what they want to read... As long as you don't run over 50 miles in them I guess you're fine.
Anybody runs in their lunar 3's? I loved the FK lunar 1's but the FK lunar 2's not so much. They felt a little more 'soggy' if that makes any sense. How do the 3's compare?
- 22,642
- 47,680
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2005
IMO, the FL2s were definitely superior to the 1s for running. For me, the 1s felt pretty clunky and loose. Their tongue kept sliding on me giving it a sloppy fit. Not only that, their soles wore significantly fast [emoji]128533[/emoji] (200mi). They're definitely a nice looking shoe, and I love wearing them casually, but I think they're overrated for running.
The 2s, on the hand(foot), felt a lot sleeker and faster. Their tongue is attached, so you don't have to worry about sloppy fit. Their soles are definitely more firm and last longer. Since the 2s and 3s share the same sole, I wouldn't expect the experience to be significantly different... If you want to run in a Flyknit and don't want to spend too much, the FL2 is the shoe for you, IMO [emoji]128077[/emoji][emoji]127996[/emoji]
The 2s, on the hand(foot), felt a lot sleeker and faster. Their tongue is attached, so you don't have to worry about sloppy fit. Their soles are definitely more firm and last longer. Since the 2s and 3s share the same sole, I wouldn't expect the experience to be significantly different... If you want to run in a Flyknit and don't want to spend too much, the FL2 is the shoe for you, IMO [emoji]128077[/emoji][emoji]127996[/emoji]
Last edited:
- 689
- 677
- Joined
- May 10, 2015
Thanks, besides them wearing out fast I didn't have the problems you describe with the 1's. I hear a lot of people who like the 2 better for running. If the sole of the 3 is the same, I will not try them. Money saved I guess!
For casual wear I'm hoping to pick some 3's up in an outlet someday.
- 839
- 158
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2014
They weren't truly MC. They were only orange and green.
- 5
- 10
- Joined
- May 1, 2015
I really need those lunar 3 NDC exclusives in size 11, can't find em anywhere 
