I think why there is a bit of debate brewing here is because these are marketed as a performance shoe. Or maybe that's not the reason, but it's the one issue that bothers me. Again, I don't work for Nike or any competing companies, I don't have any stock invested with them so I don't lose sleep over it. I do find the discussion in this thread interesting though.
The All Stars were tied to Harden in the ASG. You got some people playing in these with no issues, and you got some people hating them for performance, specifically that PU insole. And then you got some people acknowledging that they aren't getting these to play in them.
My only beef, and it's a minor one, is if they are going to make them look good and push them as on court shoes, then they should feel good as on court shoes. I don't think anyone is disputing that point, but clearly a lot of people aren't satisfied with the shoe on court. Now obviously, Nike isn't the only company that does stuff like this. Retroing T-Macs for $150 is insulting.
Nike clearly knows how to make good performance shoes, and they have released plenty of great looking performers at lower prices in the past. Remember the days of the Nike Zoom BB? Full length zoom for $90. $90! I know inflation and all that, but still. To this day it is one of my top 3 performance shoes ever. That's what Nike is capable of, so that's the standard I hold them to.