- Apr 17, 2005
- 23,270
- 50,840
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’ve heard stories like this about this pair. I’m currently on my second pair of invincibles. My first pair gave me 350+ miles of running on them. I know the midsole zoomx foam is susceptible to easy damage but I guess I’ve been lucky thus far.Not sure if this the right thread but I just returned my invincible back to Nike after a couple months the sole was separating
Upper changes I guess. I’ll stick with the 2’s.Can’t tell the diff between the IR2
Can’t tell the diff between the IR2
It’s a little disappointing that Nike is giving us the same midsole for three years in a row. It would’ve been nice if they changed it up a tried a ZoomX core or something different.The upper and the heel clip. The 1 and 2 had a straight one. The 3s have a slope to it.
Yeah but at some point you can’t just keep going ohh let’s throw some ZoomX in there and call it an update. Some folks like react over ZoomX…It’s a little disappointing that Nike is giving us the same midsole for three years in a row. It would’ve been nice if they changed it up a tried a ZoomX core or something different.
Agreed. They have different shoes for different things. Like they will never throw an air bag in there either. Can’t make everything react with ZoomX. Gotta fill all the buckets.like airmaxsk mentioned, some people prefer react over zoomx so nike will keep the option around
i just see it like NB still offering fresh foam or fuel cell shoes for the consumers that prefer one over the other
we’ve seen brands like hoka stick with their typical EVA, adidas with boost and even asics with their basic flytefoam midsole for the longest time and only have recent made changes with everyone else stepping up their game so i don’t think react still being used throw all these years is terrible especially when nike is prob trying to make zoomx more useable for a daily trainer without any carrier foam
also the epic/infinity line is what i consider to be the flagship react shoe from nike so i don’t expect them to ever throw zoomx into the midsole. that’s what we’ll have the vomero, pegs, etc for
I get your point and agree it makes sense to keep this as a React shoe. I guess my main point is there was no change to the midsole. If they’re going to keep it React, let’s see a change in the stack height or geometry.like airmaxsk mentioned, some people prefer react over zoomx so nike will keep the option around
i just see it like NB still offering fresh foam or fuel cell shoes for the consumers that prefer one over the other
we’ve seen brands like hoka stick with their typical EVA, adidas with boost and even asics with their basic flytefoam midsole for the longest time and only have recent made changes with everyone else stepping up their game so i don’t think react still being used throw all these years is terrible especially when nike is prob trying to make zoomx more useable for a daily trainer without any carrier foam
also the epic/infinity line is what i consider to be the flagship react shoe from nike so i don’t expect them to ever throw zoomx into the midsole. that’s what we’ll have the vomero, pegs, etc for
If it ain’t broke don’t fix it…I get your point and agree it makes sense to keep this as a React shoe. I guess my main point is there was no change to the midsole. If they’re going to keep it React, let’s see a change in the stack height or geometry.
Is the blue mens?
Is there a site I can go to to see all your past work??
Is there a site I can go to to see all your past work??