- 3,249
- 199
90% chances of rain tonight, fwiw. So unless you're expecting a bunch of picks/fumbles/pick 6s...short fields...I'd stay away from the o/u.
***$$$-NT Sportsbook Thread vol.2- Props props props props props props... EVERYBODY!
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by bijald0331,
- Start date
- 3,133
- 507
TopBet? Never heard of it
5dimes and Bookmaker are the only sites US customers should be using
5dimes and Bookmaker are the only sites US customers should be using
- 29,014
- 4,130
I used to be on bookmaker... But them dudes would call my cell like twice a week.
Been on 5dimes for a couple years now.
mr marcus
Banned
- 26,572
- 5,415
Honestly don't see why folks in the US ain't using 5dimes unless it's restricted in your state
- 5,469
- 2,010
I've been using a bookie lately but am I hustling backwards with using sportsbook when I bet online
- 29,014
- 4,130
Haven't won a dime on it since.
- 1,158
- 145
Might be dumb question, but is Bovada legit? Trying to get in on some NFL/NBA action this year.
larry david
Banned
- 1,685
- 638
Those damn online casino sites are a joke, had one of the homies contemplating a career change because of the against all odds dreams they were selling.... he learned....
A couple racks later.
The fact it's not regulated at all is a sure fire sign american accounts are marked off top and these sites will get your tip wet initially and give you some crazy wins in low % spots but after that initial flame you're food, like @fraij da 5 11 referenced.
Anyways, about tonight's game, these Thursday night spreads have been such a crap shoot all year... I wouldn't doubt Green Bay is winning all game and the Vikings score a late garbage time TD to cover which is why I'm staying away. Big spreads with garbage defenses like the Packers vs. an OC like Norv Turner who can put together a game-plan to stay somewhat competitive is a bigger risk than most would think, food for thought.
A couple racks later.
The fact it's not regulated at all is a sure fire sign american accounts are marked off top and these sites will get your tip wet initially and give you some crazy wins in low % spots but after that initial flame you're food, like @fraij da 5 11 referenced.
Anyways, about tonight's game, these Thursday night spreads have been such a crap shoot all year... I wouldn't doubt Green Bay is winning all game and the Vikings score a late garbage time TD to cover which is why I'm staying away. Big spreads with garbage defenses like the Packers vs. an OC like Norv Turner who can put together a game-plan to stay somewhat competitive is a bigger risk than most would think, food for thought.
Last edited:
- 14,363
- 3,028
put 3 units on Packers to win straight up this morning. I see the lines are closed now with news that Bridgewater is out. I hope to see Packers come out and flourish
- 644
- 1,547
About 65% of wagers are on GB yet the line is moving in the opposite direction.. Opened at -10.5 currently sitting at -8.. Signs lead to Teddy sitting this one out as he didn't practice all week with the sprained ankle and I have absolutely zero faith in Ponder.. But GB is dead last in total rush yard defense.. And even without AP vikings have proven to run the ball well with the one,two punch of Asiata and McKinnon.. With a 90% chance of rain, we should expect a lot of hand offs and a slower tempo to the game.. I see Viking being able to keep this one close. I'm going with Vikings and the points here and also leaning on the under.. 27-21 Packers.
NFL reduced
Vikings +8
1.5 units
NFL reduced
Vikings +8
1.5 units
- 14,363
- 3,028
Aaron Rogers is second only to Tom Brady (90.9% victories) when it comes to winning division games at home.... Unless Ponder comes out and pitches the rock like a mad man Packers should be able to handle this.
- 3,249
- 199
Gb-6.5 1u
Halos ML(got it at -175 last nt)4u
If halos lose....tripling up with shoemaker.
Sigh. Let's do it.
Halos ML(got it at -175 last nt)4u
If halos lose....tripling up with shoemaker.
Sigh. Let's do it.
Last edited:
- 3,848
- 1,903
Don't usually do parlays but what the hell....
GB -10
AZ/OR Under 82
And yes Bovada is legit. Decided to use Bovada only because they're one of the few online poker sites that can be played in the US. Otherwise I'm all about 5dimes.
Another parlay i did for s**** and giggles
GB -10
AZ/OR Under 82
GB/ Min Over 47.5
AZ +23
GB -10
AZ/OR Under 82
And yes Bovada is legit. Decided to use Bovada only because they're one of the few online poker sites that can be played in the US. Otherwise I'm all about 5dimes.
Another parlay i did for s**** and giggles
GB -10
AZ/OR Under 82
GB/ Min Over 47.5
AZ +23
Last edited:
- 29,014
- 4,130
Teasing tonight...
Packers -4
Under 53
Packers -4
Under 53
- 28,098
- 9,222
Never understood the logic behind betting teasers. If you dont like the Packers -10, but like them at -4, why not just bet Minnesota +10?
No offense @fraij da 5 11. That wasnt directed necessarily at you. Your post just triggered something I meant to bring up last season when people were heavily betting teasers.
No offense @fraij da 5 11. That wasnt directed necessarily at you. Your post just triggered something I meant to bring up last season when people were heavily betting teasers.
- 3,249
- 199
Depends on your confidence level. For ex...youre extremely confident GB will win SU....but don't wanna get moosed. Whereas contrastingly, your confidence level of minn winning..let alone covering..is much less. I'm not a teaser guy..but if I were to tease it, that's the way I'd go.
Last edited:
- 732
- 222
this is just from my standpoint but... just because he is confident in GB -4 does not mean he is just as confident as Minn +10. as in, im sure part of him thinks packers can still cover -10 but a teaser provides him a cushion.
- 497
- 91
What if he thinks its more likely that the Packers win by 5 or more than MIN keeping in within 10 points (or if he took the teaser the other way; 16 points)?
But I do kind of agree with you that some teasers ppl make are counterproductive like teasing a slight favor "across the zero" when they would be better off adding the points to the slight underdog.
Last edited:
- 29,014
- 4,130
If you look at my weekend bets I almost exclusively bet lines straight up. It tends to be primetime games TNF, MNF, SNF that I go with a 2 team teasers... So for me its more like a betting routine in NFL season than I always go heavy on teasers.
Also, I HATE NFL lines that are 10+... Don't like them at all. I would have preferred to get GB -3 but I didn't like the -147 or w.e that it was giving me.
So essentially tonight, I tend to do Primetime teasers - I hate giving 10 pts to any NFL team - The vikings and Ponder suck - should be a very rainy game and a lot of running of the football and low scoring.
But I'm never one to go with 3-4-5-6-7 team parlays... Wasting money to me... But I don't really mind a light amount on a 5-6 team teaser... Ive hit or come close to a few of em this year and its like .5 unit if that.
- 4,120
- 709
Had Packers -7.5 tonight. Hoping not buying the hook doesn't bite me in the ***. Good start though.
- 28,098
- 9,222
I do understand the "confidence level" thing. But IMO, especially when it comes to favorites, if you dont think the favorite can cover the spread as is, it makes more sense to bet the other side than tease the favorite. You guys are costing yourselves money.
- 29,014
- 4,130
I mean I've been burned teasing a team down to +16 before for sure.
But yea I dunno I seem to hit these primetime teasers more often than not.
- 4,120
- 709
