- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,945
- 30,375
Welp...Starting Q down for NIU. I'm doomed!
***$$$-NT Sportsbook Thread vol.2- Props props props props props props... EVERYBODY!
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by bijald0331,
- Start date
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,945
- 30,375
Bengals favored by 11 for Thursday. 
Huge number for the NFL and for a non-Patriots team.
Huge number for the NFL and for a non-Patriots team.
Last edited:
- Jun 24, 2005
- 17,331
- 3,631
Bengals favored by 11 for Thursday.
I feel like its almost too easy taking the Browns here
- Oct 19, 2004
- 2,358
- 595
Yall like the 1st half under again for tnf?
- Jun 24, 2005
- 17,331
- 3,631
why not?
i just blindly tail it until it loses 2 times in a row. It should be 23 this week.
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,945
- 30,375
Iowa vs. Indiana (+6.5)
I'm eyeing this one hard, dudes. Like college GOY hard. ML looks good too!
I'm eyeing this one hard, dudes. Like college GOY hard. ML looks good too!
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,945
- 30,375
**** it. I've locked it in.
Indiana +6.5 (7.5 units)
Indiana ML (2.5 units)
Indiana +6.5 (7.5 units)
Indiana ML (2.5 units)
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 107,488
- 53,670
- Jun 24, 2005
- 17,331
- 3,631
wow
im dumping my 401k on it. lets goooooooooo
, but no really i may play this pretty big. seeing you put this much on a game definitely says something about the confidence. any analysis on the game?
Last edited:
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,945
- 30,375
First off, the line is basically begging you to take Iowa. I think they're due for an L though, no? The lasting image of Indiana for the public is the lopsided score against Michigan State, but that is misleading, as Indiana played the Spartans close most of the game. 28-26 after 3 quarters and then 24 unanswered by MSU in the 4th. Two scores with under 3 minutes to go. Then they have the bye to gear up and get pumped to potentially knock off another top ranked opponent who is also undefeated. Redemption, of sorts. It's a home game and they have the offense to do it.
Indiana is back on their #1 QB, Sudfeld after missing a few and he played pretty well against MSU. He's a real gamer. Their starting RB has been dinged up, but he returned two weeks ago and was decent as well against MSU (just over 7 yards/carry and that was his first action back). For the both of them, they've had two weeks to heal with the bye and the RB has been practicing...MSU and OSU are good defenses that they have faced and have found success against. Maybe not compared to their defenses historically, but still good...This is Iowa though. We know SOS is a big "thing" in college football, so let's be real...Outside of a Northwestern team that we know a lot more about now and who was banged up when getting beat up by Iowa, who have they played? They edged out Pitt, but they have zero offense. Indiana has been tested by much better teams and played very tough and are now healthy and have a dangerous offense. Iowa's Q is a little dinged up and their starting RB is out. Still have a tough rushing attack, but I just don't like this spot for the Hawkeyes.
Indiana is back on their #1 QB, Sudfeld after missing a few and he played pretty well against MSU. He's a real gamer. Their starting RB has been dinged up, but he returned two weeks ago and was decent as well against MSU (just over 7 yards/carry and that was his first action back). For the both of them, they've had two weeks to heal with the bye and the RB has been practicing...MSU and OSU are good defenses that they have faced and have found success against. Maybe not compared to their defenses historically, but still good...This is Iowa though. We know SOS is a big "thing" in college football, so let's be real...Outside of a Northwestern team that we know a lot more about now and who was banged up when getting beat up by Iowa, who have they played? They edged out Pitt, but they have zero offense. Indiana has been tested by much better teams and played very tough and are now healthy and have a dangerous offense. Iowa's Q is a little dinged up and their starting RB is out. Still have a tough rushing attack, but I just don't like this spot for the Hawkeyes.
Last edited:
- Oct 19, 2004
- 2,358
- 595
why not?
i just blindly tail it until it loses 2 times in a row. It should be 23 this week.
Damn lol
It looked like money, that Browns td drive at the end was unexpected
I turned it off at halftime, just saw they were shut out 2nd half
ugh
Last edited:
- Jun 24, 2005
- 17,331
- 3,631
Damn lol
It looked like money, that Browns td drive at the end was unexpected
I turned it off at halftime, just saw they were shut out 2nd half
Man, those 1h overs ALWAYS end up like that
. I remember in one of the Texans primetime games, they threw a hail mary TD with the clock running out for the over. Its always something crazy happening in the final 4-5 minutes that push it over. I'm going to play it Sunday Night. It thas yet to lose twice in a row, but if it loses Sunday night the trend may be over with.
- Feb 1, 2005
- 732
- 222
Detroit Pistons +5
Washington Wizards +1.5
Washington Wizards +1.5
jpzx
Supporter
- Feb 7, 2008
- 59,391
- 28,488
Bucks +2
- Feb 17, 2008
- 2,998
- 824
BO pissed me off. I put a live bet yesterday on thunder to score 20th point. westbrook hits 2 free throws leading 21-16. I e-mail CS why I lost, of course FT's don't count as scoring 
, yet they don't mention that anywhere
, yet they don't mention that anywhere 
mr marcus
Banned
- May 3, 2010
- 26,572
- 5,415
Folks always get screwed with them type of props books get shady with them at times
books get shady with them at times
- Feb 17, 2008
- 2,998
- 824
word. I'm still up a bit, even though that was a .3u play. like if you prop bet a player to score over 30 pts, his FT's obviously count!!
I'm cashing out and sticking with DFS..
I'm cashing out and sticking with DFS..
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 107,488
- 53,670
- Oct 19, 2004
- 2,358
- 595
Wow FTs dont count as points? Thats crazy and mad shadyBO pissed me off. I put a live bet yesterday on thunder to score 20th point. westbrook hits 2 free throws leading 21-16. I e-mail CS why I lost, of course FT's don't count as scoring
- Jul 25, 2012
- 5,554
- 3,553
Fellas last night there was a gimme in the BYU San Jose St CFB game. Live Over under 52.5 after the first quarter of 14-3. If you've watched BYU you know they are not a potent offense. Ball control offense leads to long drives.
Final score 17-16 9 points total In the second half.
Final score 17-16 9 points total In the second half.
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 107,488
- 53,670
- Jun 24, 2005
- 17,331
- 3,631
FT's should count as points . I've played those type of props a few times and they definitely counted (win or lose). Whoever the book is just being grimey
. I've played those type of props a few times and they definitely counted (win or lose). Whoever the book is just being grimey
- Jul 25, 2012
- 5,554
- 3,553
My bad those live bets are open for the commercial break so u gotta be fast.gotta let us know before not after, fam!!!
glad you made out on it though
And as far as Free throws not counting I've never ever heard that. I'd be blown if my book pulled that BS
Last edited:
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 107,488
- 53,670
ready for this Iowa and Indiana game. let's get it
- Nov 19, 2005
- 2,237
- 319
The Steve Young avi
can never trust BYU though haha
