- Jun 16, 2005
- 4,153
- 336
they won't take parlay action PERIOD
***$$$-NT Sportsbook Thread vol.2- Props props props props props props... EVERYBODY!
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by bijald0331,
- Start date
they won't take parlay action PERIOD
- Jun 16, 2005
- 4,153
- 336
they won't take parlay action PERIOD
- Jan 31, 2005
- 736
- 19
^^^^you are correct sir!
- Jan 31, 2005
- 736
- 19
^^^^you are correct sir!
- Jan 2, 2008
- 1,869
- 74
2-2 yesterday....lost alot on the pats....
who u guys like 2night???
total is 1 of the lowest ive seen @ 33 and the weather is gonna be a blizzard.
who u guys like 2night???
total is 1 of the lowest ive seen @ 33 and the weather is gonna be a blizzard.
- Jan 2, 2008
- 1,869
- 74
2-2 yesterday....lost alot on the pats....
who u guys like 2night???
total is 1 of the lowest ive seen @ 33 and the weather is gonna be a blizzard.
who u guys like 2night???
total is 1 of the lowest ive seen @ 33 and the weather is gonna be a blizzard.
mr marcus
Banned
- May 3, 2010
- 26,572
- 5,415
bookie had florida atlantic +7 .....they were really -7......so i took it.....bastard better pay up today....it was only a 1 unit bet
ima be pissed if he dont cause i originally was gonna take the suns until i saw that error.....i mean he looked at the sheet and gave me my ticket so i should be good
ima be pissed if he dont cause i originally was gonna take the suns until i saw that error.....i mean he looked at the sheet and gave me my ticket so i should be good
mr marcus
Banned
- May 3, 2010
- 26,572
- 5,415
bookie had florida atlantic +7 .....they were really -7......so i took it.....bastard better pay up today....it was only a 1 unit bet
ima be pissed if he dont cause i originally was gonna take the suns until i saw that error.....i mean he looked at the sheet and gave me my ticket so i should be good
ima be pissed if he dont cause i originally was gonna take the suns until i saw that error.....i mean he looked at the sheet and gave me my ticket so i should be good
- Jan 31, 2005
- 736
- 19
^^^did they pay ya? If it's a reputable book, they should honor the wager.
- Jan 31, 2005
- 736
- 19
^^^did they pay ya? If it's a reputable book, they should honor the wager.
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,847
- 30,239
Jags as 7 point favorites even despite not having MJD? I don't know about that one. ******** look like a good play.
Ravens only -4 over Cleveland. Trap!
Anything standing out to you guys for the weekend?
Ravens only -4 over Cleveland. Trap!
Anything standing out to you guys for the weekend?
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,847
- 30,239
Jags as 7 point favorites even despite not having MJD? I don't know about that one. ******** look like a good play.
Ravens only -4 over Cleveland. Trap!
Anything standing out to you guys for the weekend?
Ravens only -4 over Cleveland. Trap!
Anything standing out to you guys for the weekend?
- Nov 18, 2010
- 4,201
- 141
They're basically begging you to take the Skins +7 with Grossman under center.
The line I'm really interested in is Oak at +3. Line is strange because you would think most of the public would be betting Indy, due to Manning and all, but the line opened at +3 and has held there.
I like Oakland though, that pass defense is more than solid, 5th overall, which should be able to curb Manning somewhat, seeing as how Collie is done, and Wayne will be blanketed by Nnamdi. Then you look at the Raiders' rushing attack, 2nd in the league, going up against the Colts' 28th ranked rush defense.
Combine all that with the fact that I think the reason the line is holding steady is because all the sharps and wiseguys are betting Oakland, you got a pretty strong play in OAK +3.
GL to all.
- Nov 18, 2010
- 4,201
- 141
They're basically begging you to take the Skins +7 with Grossman under center.
The line I'm really interested in is Oak at +3. Line is strange because you would think most of the public would be betting Indy, due to Manning and all, but the line opened at +3 and has held there.
I like Oakland though, that pass defense is more than solid, 5th overall, which should be able to curb Manning somewhat, seeing as how Collie is done, and Wayne will be blanketed by Nnamdi. Then you look at the Raiders' rushing attack, 2nd in the league, going up against the Colts' 28th ranked rush defense.
Combine all that with the fact that I think the reason the line is holding steady is because all the sharps and wiseguys are betting Oakland, you got a pretty strong play in OAK +3.
GL to all.
- Nov 14, 2007
- 8,956
- 39
Chicago +2
Boston +2
Miami +3
Boston +2
Miami +3
- Nov 14, 2007
- 8,956
- 39
Chicago +2
Boston +2
Miami +3
Boston +2
Miami +3
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,847
- 30,239
I hope nobody took the under in the Jet/Bears game. It was at 36. So far they've scored 62.
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,847
- 30,239
I hope nobody took the under in the Jet/Bears game. It was at 36. So far they've scored 62.
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,847
- 30,239
Took all the road teams ATS for this afternoons games. Progressive parlay.
Seattle +6
Indy -2.5
Houston -2
NYG +2
SD -9
Seattle +6
Indy -2.5
Houston -2
NYG +2
SD -9
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,847
- 30,239
Took all the road teams ATS for this afternoons games. Progressive parlay.
Seattle +6
Indy -2.5
Houston -2
NYG +2
SD -9
Seattle +6
Indy -2.5
Houston -2
NYG +2
SD -9
mr marcus
Banned
- May 3, 2010
- 26,572
- 5,415
late but yea he did but i lost it that next night on a bet so he got it back
mr marcus
Banned
- May 3, 2010
- 26,572
- 5,415
late but yea he did but i lost it that next night on a bet so he got it back
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,847
- 30,239
Hasselbeck going down hurts. San Diego acting like losers hurts. Keep in mind I can still lose one of those games and still win.
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,847
- 30,239
Hasselbeck going down hurts. San Diego acting like losers hurts. Keep in mind I can still lose one of those games and still win.
- Nov 25, 2007
- 4,257
- 659
Pitt -7 tonight
