- 3,807
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
So all you legal experts are saying that an adrenaline fueled pharmacist who had a gun in his face while his life was threatened seconds prior should be able to dissect a maybe-60-second long time frame into three discernible sections of pre-threat, threat, post-threat and act accordingly in all of them? Three discernible sections that even we at the comfort of our own PC's could argue over.