OF (Not Odd Future) Says "No" to Explicit Content

damn i missed the boat wanted to see what it was all about when i had time.

too much strong opinionated folks in here were only around for a short time take stuff a little less seriously and smile once in a while
 
mv.png


QbadP.png
Was scrolling IG and A FAMILIAR NAME was already promoting this :lol: :rofl:
 
Last edited:
Yall are projecting your own insecurities by assuming mine. If I follow this logic than I gotta assume any woman u can satisfy u wife up or atleast try to and don't care about the rest.
No, You should assume that you shouldn’t be posting stupid questions like that 🤷🏽‍♂️ Should be embarrassing
 
OF about to fall off.
If they were smart they could just cash out and move the money to something legit with out having to strip anymore
 
Good. But another site will take over and fill the void

Some of these girls thought the money train wouldn't end even when warned

 
ya acting like folks aren't willing to pay for "clean" emails and selfies :lol:
they'll be another site, but they definitely taking a big cut from the users
 
was just thinking.
OF bout to fall off faster than Clubhouse did
I was never on there but just from clips posted on Twitter, Clubhouse’s falloff was insane. But they should’ve already forecasted this once Covid restrictions started being lifted. The whole point of the app was to connect while being inside. With people “back outside”, Clubhouse is basically N-Gage.
 
This is the ultimate backwards hustle and evidence of how pernicious the obsession with growth can be for corporations and consumers.


They could be making money hand over fist selling pornography to people but instead they decided they needed to "grow"

1629403028290.png


lol why? why do you need new funds? why do you need to grow?

******** isn't doing anything fundamentally different than Patreon.

Twitter or Facebook could steal all their ideas and instantly decimate them
and they don't have some super effective suggestion algorithm like TIk Tok.

the only thing they had was pornography.
but they've decided they are bigger than the golden goose.

imo they are in for a rude awakening.
Complete hot take, just wild speculation...

Maybe something is coming out to ruin their porn business and they are trying to get ahead of it. If it gets tied to sex trafficking, unaged girls, or any really bad then law enforcement politicians would eat them alive for an easy political win. Lawsuits to follow too

So, maybe they know some bad press is coming so they are getting ahead of it.

Because yeah, this makes no sense. You got a popular product, name recognition, and you just kill it for VC? Something feels off to me
 
Last edited:
And yeah, some of you dudes got some major hang-ups about women, or maybe more specifically think sex workers are so far beneath you because of what they do for a living :lol:

I can't understand the level of vitriol some dudes have towards these women
 
Last edited:
they'll be another site, but they definitely taking a big cut from the users

It's not that simple. With stuff like Cannabis , sex work, firearms/firearms accessories etc businesses can run into issues with banks and or payment processors most of the big ones won't accept their money/business.
 
OF business was like the virtual version of those lame dudes that go to the skrip club every week and have their “gf” that they spend their whole paycheck on to buy them drinks all night and have them sit on their lap for 3 hours, then get one lap dance and go home and spank it. Then do it again next week. They really be thinking they got some kind of F’ed up weird relationship with the h0e.
So I was at the Waffle House last night and seen this dude tip the waitress $30 bux. I was shocked cause I usually only tip 15%. Say I spent 11 bucks on a meal that's only 1.65.
But anyways, after dude walked out the waitress and other staff members were clowning him for being 50 years old chewing lots of tobacco , wearing a mullet and dirty clothes (dude was a plumber by trade) he's known as the "PL" (personal lick) here, all the waitresses gotta do is drop a few compliments, pat him on the shoulder when they deliver his food and dude will fork over a fortune.

Interestingly, I overheard a discussion and one of the waitresses was "complaining" she only made $120 in tips the previous night over a 4 hour shift. She wasn't necessarily a dime piece either, she was 5'1" 170 lbs, had a 1996 Gwen Stefani haircut, septum piercing , two lip rings. Either way she shouldn't be making that much.
 
businesses can run into issues with banks and or payment processors

yeap, seems like the reasoning for OFs decision...

 
So I was at the Waffle House last night and …..


Interestingly, I overheard a discussion and one of the waitresses was "complaining" she only made $120 in tips the previous night over a 4 hour shift. She wasn't necessarily a dime piece either, she was 5'1" 170 lbs, had a 1996 Gwen Stefani haircut, septum piercing , two lip rings. Either way she shouldn't be making that much.
🔥 that’s a Waffle House dime piece
 
OF is trying to expand and make more money. I read somewhere a few months back that they got Magic Jonhson, Floyd and a few other notable people as advisors and investors on board and in order for them to make said moves to expand and get into bigger ventures, they had to cut the prostitution/pornography. J&j not gonna put ads for baby wipes on their site while a video is playing next to it with a chick busting it open. Just a money play at the end of the day.
 
They talking about this on the radio rn… it was prob posted here, I didn’t read it all

they said last year (idk if they meant 2020?) OF made $1.2B, next year project to make $2.5B
im thinking take about 2.49B off that projection 😂

but they said nudity will be allowed but not “sexually explicit content” which is yet to be defined
 
"Nudity allowed" means tasteful professional shoots. Legit models will be fine but the amateurs bustin' it open are done.

September is going to be a wild month on OF.

One last heist. People are going to go all in. :lol:
 
I guess it's either a fast death through non-compliance vs. slow death through the measures they are enacting...

either way OF is likely donzo...

Internal documents, leaked to BBC News, reveal that ******** allows moderators to give multiple warnings to accounts that post illegal content on its online platform before deciding to close them.

Described as a "compliance manual", the documents also show that staff are asked to be more lenient towards successful accounts on the British content-sharing service.

Moderation specialists and child protection experts say this shows ******** - which is best known for hosting pornography - has some "tolerance" for accounts posting illegal content.

******** says it goes far beyond "all relevant global safety standards and regulations" and does not tolerate breaches of its terms of service.


The children selling explicit videos on ******** - BBC News

British subscription site ******** is failing to prevent underage users from selling and appearing in explicit videos, a BBC investigation has found.

Under-18s have used fake identification to set up accounts, and police say a 14-year-old used a grandmother's passport.

The UK's most senior police officer for child protection also says children are being "exploited" on the platform

******** says its age verification systems go over and above regulatory requirements.

The platform has more than a million "creators" who share video clips, photos and messages directly with subscribers for a monthly fee.
In return for hosting the material, ******** takes a 20% share of all payments.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom