- 3,405
- 10
Originally Posted by CincoSeisDos
Opie is dealing
to bad the other dude is to
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by CincoSeisDos
Opie is dealing
From Dodger Thoughts, sums it up nicely:Originally Posted by bright nikes
Dodgers last 15 games: 6-9
Dodgers since ASG: 11-11
I've been accused this season of knee-jerk apologies and homerism this season in my responses to criticisms of the Dodgers. As I've said before, my take on the Dodgers arises from a big-picture mentality. I'm not at all without my concerns about the team or its management, but this is still the best Dodger team at this point of the season in over 30 years. That colors my responses.
Conversely, there's the issue of knee-jerk panic. Sometimes I read people's reactions to what happens at Dodger games and wonder if this is the first year some people have ever watched baseball (so true,...). Clayton Kershaw has one bad game in two months, and people start questioning his makeup again (BN and his constant gripes with the bullpen). Manny Ramirez has a slump, and people fear the worst: His body is failing him.
Yes, the worst is possible. But there just seems to be insufficient recognition of the most common reality of baseball. Hitters who bat .300 in a season don't bat .300 every week of that season. Pitchers who have a 3.00 ERA in a season don't have a 3.00 ERA every game.
A default response that causes people immediately to assume imminent tragedy -- that's essentially the definition of panic. I understand why it comes, but it still surprises me that the most likely explanation is often the most ignored one.
Players slump. Luck changes.
I'll throw a bone to the doomsayers. I truly would like to see the Dodgers pulling away in the National League West rather seeing their lead stay in single-digits. The longer the Rockies and Giants stay in the race, the more viable their ability to spoil the Dodger season becomes.
But then you step back and realize that for all the impressive win totals Colorado and San Francisco have been putting up, they haven't been able to gain any significant ground. And then you look more closely at those teams, and realize that they have their own sets of problems they're still dealing with.
And I'm back to thinking it's hard not to feel optimistic about the Los Angeles Dodgers, and back to feeling that it doesn't make sense to assume the worst about players on the team who have great overall performances in 2009.
[h1]Dodgers Move In The Works?[/h1]
By Mike Axisa [August 8 at 10:24pm CST]
The Dodgers - who made valiant attempts to acquire Roy Halladay, Cliff Lee, and seemingly every other available pitcher before the deadline - are in a bit of a pitching bind right now because of injuries to Jason Schmidt and Chad Billingsley. Manager Joe Torre had some interesting comments prior to tonight's game against the Braves when asked about who the team's starter would be tomorrow, courtesy of MLB.com's David Ely:
"Right now, we're in the discussion area on that one," Torre said. "We're not at liberty to talk about it at this point. You'll know later on."
"Could be somebody from the outside," Torre said, "we haven't decided on that."
League rules prohibit teams from talking about specific players on waivers, and Ely speculates that they "could be in the process of making a trade for a pitcher off waivers." Depending on how tonight's game plays out, the Dodgers could opt to start longman Jeff Weaver if no deal is made.
Whas happenin' here
Originally Posted by sinser13