- 16,335
- 13
Hey, speaking of which, I think I might finally pick up a next generation system (PS3) this weekend. Once I get acclimated, I'll be up for a little 2K11 and Madden with you guys.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Naw, I'm not on Yao, had a question from earlier stuff.Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
Does shooting efficiently have value? Probably.Originally Posted by CP1708
Osh, does True Shooting % have value?
Naw, I'm not on Yao, had a question from earlier stuff.Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
Does shooting efficiently have value? Probably.Originally Posted by CP1708
Osh, does True Shooting % have value?
"None of them 7'6" is the key phrase, considering how few people have been effective at his size, I looked it up, of guys over 7-3 (the height above which I think we accept as being freak status.) Yao has the 2nd Highest rebound rate behind Sabonis.Originally Posted by Kiddin Like Jason
A number of non-athletic, not quick players who are more productive rebounders than Yao, none of them 7'6", come to mind.
A 7'6" starter, as "dominant" as he was in the paint, and a potential "all-time great," should have done it better. Maybe it is just my opinion, but it's a reasonable one.
And he wasn't out of shape his whole career? I recall watching him lumber up and down the court every single possession and pick up a ton of sloppy fouls. It has been like six years since he's actually been on an NBA floor, though, so maybe I just can't remember.
I don't know what, "1 out of 5 in Canada we call that a fail, im not sure how your education system would score it." means.
"None of them 7'6" is the key phrase, considering how few people have been effective at his size, I looked it up, of guys over 7-3 (the height above which I think we accept as being freak status.) Yao has the 2nd Highest rebound rate behind Sabonis.Originally Posted by Kiddin Like Jason
A number of non-athletic, not quick players who are more productive rebounders than Yao, none of them 7'6", come to mind.
A 7'6" starter, as "dominant" as he was in the paint, and a potential "all-time great," should have done it better. Maybe it is just my opinion, but it's a reasonable one.
And he wasn't out of shape his whole career? I recall watching him lumber up and down the court every single possession and pick up a ton of sloppy fouls. It has been like six years since he's actually been on an NBA floor, though, so maybe I just can't remember.
I don't know what, "1 out of 5 in Canada we call that a fail, im not sure how your education system would score it." means.
QFTMFT. Completely agree with pretty much everything you wrote. Especially the statement about WestphalOriginally Posted by rck2sactown
What is going on in Sacramento? I haven't seen much improvement out of Omri Casspi and Tyreke Evans isn't looking like the savior that many had dubbed him as. They've both picked it up a little bit as of late.... but damn. I was jealous of that Evans-Cousins tandem before the season and now with those reports coming out over the past month about players not feeling Cousins in the locker room, I don't know what to think of it. We knew he had attitude concerns, but damn, already?Originally Posted by JPZx
... I feel like a group like that might need a coach that has made a name for himself. I know Westphal reached the Finals with the Suns in 1993, but that team was pretty much handed to him when Cotton Fitzsimmons retired. All this being said, it's early.
QFTMFT. Completely agree with pretty much everything you wrote. Especially the statement about WestphalOriginally Posted by rck2sactown
What is going on in Sacramento? I haven't seen much improvement out of Omri Casspi and Tyreke Evans isn't looking like the savior that many had dubbed him as. They've both picked it up a little bit as of late.... but damn. I was jealous of that Evans-Cousins tandem before the season and now with those reports coming out over the past month about players not feeling Cousins in the locker room, I don't know what to think of it. We knew he had attitude concerns, but damn, already?Originally Posted by JPZx
... I feel like a group like that might need a coach that has made a name for himself. I know Westphal reached the Finals with the Suns in 1993, but that team was pretty much handed to him when Cotton Fitzsimmons retired. All this being said, it's early.
The point of TS% is to add FTA and 3P into you regular shooting percentage, it's not about who is a better shooter because you would have to watch the game to determine that. (which I never do)Originally Posted by CP1708
Naw, I'm not on Yao, had a question from earlier stuff.Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
Does shooting efficiently have value? Probably.Originally Posted by CP1708
Osh, does True Shooting % have value?
So, does True Shooting % imply a person is a better shooter then another? What factors does the % bring in? For instance Shaq wouldn't be a better shooter then Kobe, because he takes shots from 2 feet, etc. So what does it factor for it's equation?
I wish one of the stat guys had the time to actually create a thread, and go thru the different "new" numbers thing they use, and break them down. I may not agree with them, but I would read that and listen. (I know that takes a ton of time) Or I suppose if one of them would want to do some of them in here.
The point of TS% is to add FTA and 3P into you regular shooting percentage, it's not about who is a better shooter because you would have to watch the game to determine that. (which I never do)Originally Posted by CP1708
Naw, I'm not on Yao, had a question from earlier stuff.Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
Does shooting efficiently have value? Probably.Originally Posted by CP1708
Osh, does True Shooting % have value?
So, does True Shooting % imply a person is a better shooter then another? What factors does the % bring in? For instance Shaq wouldn't be a better shooter then Kobe, because he takes shots from 2 feet, etc. So what does it factor for it's equation?
I wish one of the stat guys had the time to actually create a thread, and go thru the different "new" numbers thing they use, and break them down. I may not agree with them, but I would read that and listen. (I know that takes a ton of time) Or I suppose if one of them would want to do some of them in here.
PPS does a similar thing, different way of skinning the same cat.Originally Posted by CP1708
But it doesn't determine who the better shooter is then? Ok, that makes me feel a little better at least. JH has Rondo with a higher TS% then D Rose, and if that implied who the better shooter was, NT was about to come to an end.
Soooo, Corey Maggette = Colston status because of how many times he flops to the line?That's some bogusness right there. I'm not sure about the whole FT attempts, being included in a shooting percentage. Points per shot, (used to be one of Doug Collins fav stats) I can understand the need, but TS% with free throw attempts? Weird.
PPS does a similar thing, different way of skinning the same cat.Originally Posted by CP1708
But it doesn't determine who the better shooter is then? Ok, that makes me feel a little better at least. JH has Rondo with a higher TS% then D Rose, and if that implied who the better shooter was, NT was about to come to an end.
Soooo, Corey Maggette = Colston status because of how many times he flops to the line?That's some bogusness right there. I'm not sure about the whole FT attempts, being included in a shooting percentage. Points per shot, (used to be one of Doug Collins fav stats) I can understand the need, but TS% with free throw attempts? Weird.