- 780
- 10
- Joined
- May 7, 2009
Originally Posted by got shoes
WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!! I guess KG has retired
Official 2010 ECF series thread: Orlando magic vs. Boston Celtics (BOS leads 3-2)Not so fast BOS
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by edweeno,
- Start date
- 21,365
- 812
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2003
Is that Julius Peppers on the sideline next to boston's bench? If so, I see why that chick is there.
big j 33
Supporter
- 35,595
- 16,000
- Joined
- May 31, 2006
If the game was fixed, why not give Pierce a flagrant for that BLATANT push, it was right in front of Crawford?
Then the next play Rashard gets a foul called away from the ball.
Then the next play Rashard gets a foul called away from the ball.
- 11,385
- 31
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2008
Boston sucks, real talk
- 34,430
- 27,602
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2002
- 2,156
- 45
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2007
Originally Posted by hellomarco
Monstars stole Davis' skills
- 4,369
- 23
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2008
Jameer for 3
This games over
This games over
- 676
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2004
Okay buddy, looking at a replay at any moment during the game is definitely a technical...Originally Posted by Durden7
You obviously also fail to see the difference between a reactionary moment and a thought out moment.Originally Posted by petozham
Originally Posted by Durden7
That wasnt the same thing.
These two situations are VERY different.
Carter deserved his....He was by the scorers table looking at the replay not even saying a word under his breath like Perkins was and he got a T....
Both those technical fouls were BS, AND Howard's assigned flagrant on Boston's punkass acting was also BS....
FYI Celtics fans, while you guys are screaming blasphemy and moaning, Boston has 9 more freethrow's.
...I'm glad you're not a ref
- 6,376
- 433
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2007
I didnt say it was a premeditated technical and I never claimed it was a court of law SON. Theres a very big difference between reacting and have time to cool off, then react.Originally Posted by ryaneff23
Originally Posted by Durden7
Homer?Originally Posted by ryaneff23
Originally Posted by Durden7
That wasnt the same thing.
These two situations are VERY different.
Carter deserved his.
Can you explain why? He did the EXACT same thing, except he wasn't even on the court.. Break it down for me, though... It's not like your opinion is bias, Celtics homer...
Its not the exact same thing when one player is reacting on the court and the other decides to go over to the scorers table to watch a replay THEN freak out on the bench. Perkins reacted. Vince had time to cool down, decided to take a second look and freaked out after that.
One is reactionary, the other is thought out.
What the hell are you talking about? He thought it out? No such thing as a premeditated Technical. This aint the court of law, it's basketball son... You can swing it anyway you want, but Vince's actions were almost exactly the same except he wasn't even on the court. I'm done though. No sense in arguing with a Celtics fan, I guess.
Big Baby wobblin like Glass Joe from Mike Tyson's Punchout.
So at first it was "EXACT" and now its "almost exactly". Which one is it?
- 676
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2004
Okay buddy, looking at a replay at any moment during the game is definitely a technical...Originally Posted by Durden7
You obviously also fail to see the difference between a reactionary moment and a thought out moment.Originally Posted by petozham
Originally Posted by Durden7
That wasnt the same thing.
These two situations are VERY different.
Carter deserved his....He was by the scorers table looking at the replay not even saying a word under his breath like Perkins was and he got a T....
Both those technical fouls were BS, AND Howard's assigned flagrant on Boston's punkass acting was also BS....
FYI Celtics fans, while you guys are screaming blasphemy and moaning, Boston has 9 more freethrow's.
...I'm glad you're not a ref
- 257
- 10
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
Way to cheapen the game with the Hack-A-Howard
- 21,365
- 812
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2003
Are you kidding me? THE GAME IS ALREADY OVER!
Perkins is not only out for this game, he's done for game 6. This has been a disgusting display of officiating and they deserve every accusation of corruption.
- 44,156
- 2,483
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2006
Props on the avy
My fav Street Fighter game
chicityk7
Banned
- 1,562
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2008
that was a dirty @+% foul on pierce....& no whistle for a T either smh
- 11,385
- 31
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2008
Boston is some old bums. Call the ambulance, wait Big Baby already got it
- 28,097
- 2,607
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2002
Does sheed ever NOT get in foul trouble?
- 11,385
- 31
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2008
Originally Posted by finnns2003
Are you kidding me? THE GAME IS ALREADY OVER!
Perkins is not only out for this game, he's done for game 6. This has been a disgusting display of officiating and they deserve every accusation of corruption.
- 6,376
- 433
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2007
I didnt say it was a premeditated technical and I never claimed it was a court of law SON. Theres a very big difference between reacting and have time to cool off, then react.Originally Posted by ryaneff23
Originally Posted by Durden7
Homer?Originally Posted by ryaneff23
Originally Posted by Durden7
That wasnt the same thing.
These two situations are VERY different.
Carter deserved his.
Can you explain why? He did the EXACT same thing, except he wasn't even on the court.. Break it down for me, though... It's not like your opinion is bias, Celtics homer...
Its not the exact same thing when one player is reacting on the court and the other decides to go over to the scorers table to watch a replay THEN freak out on the bench. Perkins reacted. Vince had time to cool down, decided to take a second look and freaked out after that.
One is reactionary, the other is thought out.
What the hell are you talking about? He thought it out? No such thing as a premeditated Technical. This aint the court of law, it's basketball son... You can swing it anyway you want, but Vince's actions were almost exactly the same except he wasn't even on the court. I'm done though. No sense in arguing with a Celtics fan, I guess.
Big Baby wobblin like Glass Joe from Mike Tyson's Punchout.
So at first it was "EXACT" and now its "almost exactly". Which one is it?
- 3,009
- 421
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2002
- 10,884
- 19
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2006
Thank you Orlando
- 676
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2004
Okay buddy, looking at a replay at any moment during the game is definitely a technical...Originally Posted by Durden7
You obviously also fail to see the difference between a reactionary moment and a thought out moment.Originally Posted by petozham
Originally Posted by Durden7
That wasnt the same thing.
These two situations are VERY different.
Carter deserved his....He was by the scorers table looking at the replay not even saying a word under his breath like Perkins was and he got a T....
Both those technical fouls were BS, AND Howard's assigned flagrant on Boston's punkass acting was also BS....
FYI Celtics fans, while you guys are screaming blasphemy and moaning, Boston has 9 more freethrow's.
...I'm glad you're not a ref
- 5,161
- 490
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
the only way this game could get better is if Dwight or someone lays out Pierce. My hatred for the celtics is strong.
- 714
- 122
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2003
Its funny how many times Pierce just outright shoves other players on the offensive end and gets away with it..
- 21,784
- 2,957
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2007
Celtics falling like flies. If I were them I'd pray that Rasheed just has a small tweek, or else we're headed for a seventh game.
- 966
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2008
Told u finnns, 1 game at a time. Now ya'll might be without both perkins and davis for game 6. Not a good lookOriginally Posted by finnns2003
Are you kidding me? THE GAME IS ALREADY OVER!
Perkins is not only out for this game, he's done for game 6. This has been a disgusting display of officiating and they deserve every accusation of corruption.