- 5,599
- 736
^^ i would aslo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
would you pass on forte for bush?Ya I think I wouldwould you guys pass on steven jackson and reach for reggie bush in a ppr league?
That would be tough...... but no Forte>Bush in PPR for mewould you pass on forte for bush?Ya I think I wouldwould you guys pass on steven jackson and reach for reggie bush in a ppr league?
would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft
same to me but you still have to consider that its PPRHaving good to great wide receivers is overrated in fantasy to me.would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft
would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft
In my 16 team standard scoring league, if I went RB-RB-RB, what WR should I target in round 4-6 (picks 52,77,84)Having good to great wide receivers is overrated in fantasy to me.would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft
In my 16 team standard scoring league, if I went RB-RB-RB, what WR should I target in round 4-6 (picks 52,77,84)would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft
Having good to great wide receivers is overrated in fantasy to me.
would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft
Having good to great wide receivers is overrated in fantasy to me.
same to me but you still have to consider that its PPR
What the earliest you'd take Thompkins??Cecil Short, Tavon Austin, Greg Jennings, Deandre Hopkins, Kenbrell Thompkins are all I can think of at the moment. Possibly Torrey Smith at #52?In my 16 team standard scoring league, if I went RB-RB-RB, what WR should I target in round 4-6 (picks 52,77,84)would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft
Having good to great wide receivers is overrated in fantasy to me.
^ That's perfectly fine imo. There's plenty of viable WRs to be had from round 4 and on.
I wouldn't take him over Forte. I wouldn't take neither Bush or Sproles over Forte.^ I REALLY like Reggie this year. I honestly think I'd take him over Forte. I'd definitely take Sproles over both of em.
me either. this is hype at its finest. dont get me wrong , i really like bush but not over forte. stafford wont be checking down as much with megatron in game. in a ppr starting to lean bush over spoles because he will be in many more snaps than spoles who shares the backfield more. in a 12 team league having pick 9 , 10 , 11 , or 12 and starting off with dez and bush or a forte bush start does peak my interest.I wouldn't take him over Forte. I wouldn't take neither Bush or Sproles over Forte.
I wouldn't take him over Forte. I wouldn't take neither Bush or Sproles over Forte.^ I REALLY like Reggie this year. I honestly think I'd take him over Forte. I'd definitely take Sproles over both of em.
me either. this is hype at its finest. dont get me wrong , i really like bush but not over forte. stafford wont be checking down as much with megatron in game. in a ppr starting to lean bush over spoles because he will be in many more snaps than spoles who shares the backfield more. in a 12 team league having pick 9 , 10 , 11 , or 12 and starting off with dez and bush or a forte bush start does peak my interest.I wouldn't take him over Forte. I wouldn't take neither Bush or Sproles over Forte.
trentForte or T-rich in a PPR?
What the earliest you'd take Thompkins??In my 16 team standard scoring league, if I went RB-RB-RB, what WR should I target in round 4-6 (picks 52,77,84)would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft
Having good to great wide receivers is overrated in fantasy to me.
Cecil Short, Tavon Austin, Greg Jennings, Deandre Hopkins, Kenbrell Thompkins are all I can think of at the moment. Possibly Torrey Smith at #52?
I'm thinking in the TY Hilton range