- Aug 22, 2013
- 12,555
- 5,657
Well, the future of HBO boxing is secure in my view. We certainly are going to sustain our long term interest in boxing and make every effort to be seen as the network where the greatest fighters in the world appear.
If you look at my top 5 on TFG, or ESPN's top 10, or any other pound for pound list, the names on that list by and large are fighters on HBO. We focus on seeing those fighters on our network, without regard to whether they're American or Ukrainain, just that they're the best.
There are fewer fights right now on the network than has been the case in the past. Some of that has to do with the fact that the current cultural scene, a lot of fighters are eager to capitalize and make as much money as they can, and they lead themselves to believe that because they're big stars, they're PPV commodities. If a fighter and a promoter want to appear on PPV, it's difficult for us to dissuade them and so they have to learn the hard way. We've had instances where we've cooperated and done PPV shows and they made less money than if they'd taken the license fee, but we can't force them.
We still want to have the very best fighters in the world, but the other restriction is that the parent company, Time Warner, has had two very large financial situations with which to deal. A hostile takeover threat from Rupert Murdoch, which ultimately they fought off by strengthening the balance sheet and showing that we were secure. Following that came a different kind of offer from oAT&T which appears to be a sympathetic merger, and as we prepare for that, it makes sense not to do anything that upsets the apple cart and makes the balance sheet look different than before. The fewer risks we take, the better off we are for the moment but I expect that to clear up in the next year or so where we'll be more adventurous.
The overall image isn't going to change. We're devoted to being who we are.
From the Lampley AMA on r/boxing